Key result
Impaired remote myocardial circumferential strain was a strong predictor of major adverse cardiac events at 12 months following acute myocardial infarction (HR 1.05).
Why the study?
Functional analyses of the remote myocardium are scarce and whether they provide additional prognostic value after acute myocardial infarction is unknown.
Does CMR-FT-derived remote myocardial circumferential strain predict major adverse cardiac events in patients following acute myocardial infarction?
Population
1034 patients following acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Comparison
Remote myocardial circumferential strain levels
Design
Cohort study
Follow-up
12 months
Authors
Loading...
Impaired remote myocardium strain was associated with MACE beyond standard CMR parameters; extends post-AMI risk stratification but leaves practice change open.
Cohort (n=1,034)
Yes
Does CMR-FT-derived remote myocardial circumferential strain predict major adverse cardiac events in patients following acute myocardial infarction?
Hazard Ratio: 1.05 (95% CI 1.07–1.14)
p-value: p=0.003
CMR-FT-derived remote myocardial circumferential strain provides incremental prognostic value for predicting 12-month MACE in patients following acute myocardial infarction, especially in high-risk subgroups.
Lange et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=1,034). Impaired remote myocardial circumferential strain vs. Preserved remote myocardial circumferential strain was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 12 months (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.07-1.14, p=0.003). Impaired remote myocardial circumferential strain was a strong predictor of major adverse cardiac events at 12 months following acute myocardial infarction (HR 1.05).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: