Why the study?
The frequency and distribution of left ventricular venous collaterals were studied in vivo to evaluate the ease and feasibility of implanting a new ultra-thin LV quadripolar microlead for CRT.
Is it feasible to use the left ventricular venous collateral network to implant a new ultra-thin quadripolar microlead in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Observational (n=85)
Open-label
Yes
Is it feasible to use the left ventricular venous collateral network to implant a new ultra-thin quadripolar microlead in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
The consistent presence of left ventricular venous collaterals in CRT patients provides a feasible anatomical route for accessing multiple LV sites using a single ultra-thin quadripolar microlead.
BACKGROUND: Frequency and distribution of left ventricular (LV) venous collaterals were studied in vivo to evaluate the ease and feasibility of implanting a new ultra-thin LV quadripolar microlead for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Evaluable venograms were analyzed to define the prevalence of venous collaterals (>0.5 mm diameter) between: (1) different LV segments; and (2) different major LV veins in: unselected patients who underwent CRT from 2008 to 2012 at Rouen Hospital, France (retrospective); and CRT patients from the Axone Acute pilot study in 2018 (prospective). In prospective patients with evaluable venograms, LV microlead implantation was attempted. Thirty-six (21/65 retrospective, 15/20 prospective) patients had evaluable venograms with ≥1 visible venous collaterals. Collaterals were found between LV veins in all CRT patients with evaluable venograms. Regionally, prevalence was highest between: the apical inferior and apical lateral (42%); and mid inferior and mid inferolateral (42%) segments. Collateral connections were most prevalent between: the inferior interventricular vein (IIV) and lateral vein (64% [23/36]); and IIV and infero-lateral vein (36% [13/36]). Cross-vein microlead implantation was possible in 18 patients (90%), and single-vein implantation was conducted in the other 2 patients (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Venous collaterals were found in vivo between LV veins in all CRT patients with evaluable venograms, making this network an option for accessing multiple LV sites using a single LV microlead.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anselme et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=85). Ultra-thin LV quadripolar microlead was evaluated on Prevalence of venous collaterals between connected LV segments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: