Key result
Aktiia cuffless monitor yields 24-hour systolic BP measurements comparable to standard ABPM.
Why the study?
Cuffless blood pressure monitors offer continual assessment beyond episodic cuff-based modalities, but their performance compared with standard cuff-based devices remains debated.
Does a cuffless, continual blood pressure monitor provide 24-hour, daytime, and night-time blood pressure measurements comparable to a standard 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor in post-myocardial infarction or heart surgery patients?
Observational (n=54)
No
Does a cuffless, continual blood pressure monitor provide 24-hour, daytime, and night-time blood pressure measurements comparable to a standard 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor in post-myocardial infarction or heart surgery patients?
Mean Difference: 2.6 (95% CI -0.2–5.4)
Absolute Event Rate: 110% vs 108%
p-value: p=0.06
A wrist-worn, cuffless blood pressure monitor provides 24-hour and daytime readings consistent with standard ambulatory monitoring, and can accurately track nocturnal dipping when an adapted threshold is utilized.
OBJECTIVES: Cuffless blood pressure (BP) monitors represent an innovative approach to BP assessment, overcoming the traditional episodic nature of readings obtained from cuff-based, oscillometric modalities. Nonetheless, the comparison of these cuffless devices against their cuff-based counterparts remain debated. METHODS: This study evaluated BP readings from a cuffless, continual BP monitor (Aktiia monitor, Neuchâtel, Switzerland) and a standard 24-h ambulatory BP monitor (ABPM; Dyasis 3, Novacor, Paris, France) in 54 patients undergoing a 12-week cardiac rehabilitation program in Neuchâtel, Switzerland. Comparisons encompassed 24-h, daytime (9 a.m.-9 p.m.), and night-time (11 p.m.-7 a.m.) systolic and diastolic BP (SBP, DBP) using a 7-day average from Aktiia overlapping a 1-day average from ABPM. Nocturnal dip analysis was performed with 1-day average from Aktiia coinciding with ABPM measurements. RESULTS: No significant differences emerged between the Aktiia and ABPM monitors for 24-h and daytime SBP (24-h: 2.6 ± 12.3 [-0.2, 5.4] mmHg, r = 0.57, P = 0.06; daytime: 1.2 ± 12.4 [-1.6, 4.0] mmHg, r = 0.60, P = 0.38). Night-time SBP showed more evident differences (12.5 ± 14.4 [9.3, 15.8] mmHg, r = 0.39, P < 0.001). DBP were within clinical range across 24-h and daytime (24-h: -2.9 ± 7.9 [-4.7, -1.1] mmHg, r = 0.63, P = 0.002; daytime: -3.1 ± 8.2 [-5.0, -1.3] mmHg, r = 0.64, P = 0.001), and showed significant differences for night-time (4.1 ± 8.5 [2.2, 6.0] mmHg, r = 0.57, P < 0.001). The concordance rate with ABPM's nocturnal dip was 79% for 1-day average from Aktiia. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the Aktiia monitor yields BP measurements consistent with an ABPM monitor despite some systematic differences during night-time readings. The Aktiia monitor holds potential for future use in continual BP monitoring. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04548986. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04548986?tab=results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almeida et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Hypertension monitoring post-myocardial infarction or heart surgery (n=54). Aktiia cuffless blood pressure monitor vs. 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) was evaluated on 24-hour systolic blood pressure (MD 2.6, 95% CI -0.2, 5.4, p=0.06). The Aktiia cuffless monitor yielded 24-hour systolic blood pressure measurements comparable to standard ambulatory monitoring (mean difference 2.6 mmHg, p=0.06), despite night-time differences.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: