Why the study?
Does a cuffless blood pressure monitor provide equivalent daytime blood pressure measurements compared to a traditional ambulatory blood pressure monitor in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation?
Does a cuffless blood pressure monitor provide equivalent daytime blood pressure measurements compared to a traditional ambulatory blood pressure monitor in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation?
The Aktiia cuffless blood pressure monitor provides daytime blood pressure measurements comparable to traditional ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Equivalent daytime BP with cuffless monitor in CR; supports validation but should not yet change practice.
In this preliminary study, we compared daytime blood pressure (BP) measurements performed by a commercially available cuffless—and continual—BP monitor (Aktiia monitor, Neuchâtel, Switzerland) and a traditional ambulatory BP monitor (ABPM; Dyasis 3, Novacor, Paris, France) from 52 patients enrolled in a 12-week cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program (Neuchâtel, Switzerland). Daytime (9am–9pm) systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP from 7-day averaged data from Aktiia monitor were compared to 1-day averaged BP data from ABPM. No significant differences were found between the Aktiia monitor and the ABPM for SBP (μ ± σ [95% confidence interval]: 1.6 ± 10.5 [−1.5, 4.6] mmHg, P = 0.306; correlation [ R 2 ]: 0.70; ± 10/ ± 15 mmHg agreements: 60%, 84%). Marginally non-significant bias was found for DBP (−2.2 ± 8.0 [−4.5, 0.1] mmHg, P = 0.058; R 2 : 0.66; ±10/±15 mmHg agreements: 78%, 96%). These intermediate results show that daytime BP measurements using the Aktiia monitor generate data comparable to that of an ABPM monitor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almeida et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: