Key result
A riser blood pressure pattern in very elderly outpatients was associated with a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular events independently of mean nighttime BP (HR 3.11; 95% CI 1.10-8.88).
Why the study?
It was hypothesized that higher mean nighttime blood pressure levels and/or a riser blood pressure pattern on ambulatory monitoring would predict higher risk for cardiovascular disease events in very elderly individuals.
Does a riser pattern of nighttime blood pressure increase the risk of cardiovascular disease events in very elderly outpatients?
Observational (n=485)
Does a riser pattern of nighttime blood pressure increase the risk of cardiovascular disease events in very elderly outpatients?
Hazard Ratio: 3.11 (95% CI 1.1–8.88)
In very elderly outpatients (≥80 years), a riser pattern of nighttime blood pressure is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events, whereas absolute ambulatory blood pressure levels are not.
Nighttime BP patterns may flag higher CVD risk in very elderly; leaves open whether ABPM-guided interventions improve outcomes.
BACKGROUND: We examined our hypothesis that participants with higher mean nighttime blood pressure (BP) levels and/or those with a riser BP pattern, both measured by ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM), would show higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events compared to those with normal nighttime BP levels or a normal dipper BP pattern of circadian BP rhythm, even in very elderly participants in a general practice population. METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled 485 very elderly outpatients of ≥80 years (mean age: 83.2 ± 3.3 years; 44.7% male; 89.3% using antihypertensive medications). The prevalences of extreme dipper, dipper, nondipper, and riser status were 15.5%, 38.6%, 32.2%, and 13.8%, respectively. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 3.9 years (1,734 person-years), 41 CVD events occurred. The participants with a riser pattern (higher nighttime systolic BP [SBP] than daytime SBP) showed a significantly higher risk for CVD events with adjustment for covariates: hazard ratio (HR), 2.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-6.62. Even after adjusting for covariates and mean nighttime SBP level, the CVD risks in participants with a riser pattern remained significant: HR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.10-8.88. On the other hand, all BP variables showed no significant risks for CVD events. In addition, when we divided study participants into quartiles by their ambulatory BP levels, none of the ambulatory BP variables showed a J- or U-shaped relationship with CVD event risk. CONCLUSIONS: In very elderly general practice outpatients, a riser BP pattern was significantly associated with CVD events independently of mean nighttime BP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujiwara et al. (2020) conducted an observational in very elderly outpatients (n=485). Riser blood pressure pattern vs. Normal nighttime BP levels or normal dipper BP pattern was evaluated on Cardiovascular disease (CVD) events (HR 3.11, 95% CI 1.10-8.88). A riser blood pressure pattern in very elderly outpatients was associated with a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular events independently of mean nighttime BP (HR 3.11; 95% CI 1.10-8.88).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: