Key result
Active case management by pharmacists substantially improved the attainment of blood pressure and LDL cholesterol targets by an absolute 12.5% compared to nurse-led case management at 6 months.
Why the study?
Does active case management by pharmacists improve blood pressure and lipid level control in adults with recent minor ischemic stroke or TIA compared to nurse-led case management?
RCT (n=279)
Open-label
Blocked, stratified
Yes
Does active case management by pharmacists improve blood pressure and lipid level control in adults with recent minor ischemic stroke or TIA compared to nurse-led case management?
Pharmacist-led active case management with prescribing authority significantly improves blood pressure and lipid target attainment after minor stroke compared to nurse-led screening and feedback.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pharmacist- or nurse-led case management was associated with improved risk factor control post-minor stroke; leaves open effects on recurrent events in routine care.
BACKGROUND: Optimization of systolic blood pressure and lipid levels are essential for secondary prevention after ischemic stroke, but there are substantial gaps in care, which could be addressed by nurse- or pharmacist-led care. We compared 2 types of case management (active prescribing by pharmacists or nurse-led screening and feedback to primary care physicians) in addition to usual care. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized controlled trial involving adults with recent minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack whose systolic blood pressure or lipid levels were above guideline targets. Participants in both groups had a monthly visit for 6 months with either a nurse or pharmacist. Nurses measured cardiovascular risk factors, counselled patients and faxed results to primary care physicians (active control). Pharmacists did all of the above as well as prescribed according to treatment algorithms (intervention). RESULTS: Most of the 279 study participants (mean age 67.6 yr, mean systolic blood pressure 134 mm Hg, mean low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol 3.23 mmol/L) were already receiving treatment at baseline (antihypertensives: 78.1%; statins: 84.6%), but none met guideline targets (systolic blood pressure ≤ 140 mm Hg, fasting LDL cholesterol ≤ 2.0 mmol/L). Substantial improvements were observed in both groups after 6 months: 43.4% of participants in the pharmacist case manager group met both systolic blood pressure and LDL guideline targets compared with 30.9% in the nurse-led group (12.5% absolute difference; number needed to treat = 8, p = 0.03). INTERPRETATION: Compared with nurse-led case management (risk factor evaluation, counselling and feedback to primary care providers), active case management by pharmacists substantially improved risk factor control at 6 months among patients who had experienced a stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT00931788.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McAlister et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=279). Pharmacist-led case management vs. Nurse-led case management was evaluated on Attainment of optimal blood pressure (≤140 mm Hg) and lipid control (LDL ≤2.0 mmol/L) at 6 months (ARR 12.5%, 95% CI 0.4-24.0, p=0.03). Active case management by pharmacists substantially improved the attainment of blood pressure and LDL cholesterol targets by an absolute 12.5% compared to nurse-led case management at 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: