Key result
The Nissei DS-400 blood pressure device met International Protocol and AAMI criteria for accuracy compared to mercury sphygmomanometry, with a mean systolic difference of 0.8 mmHg.
Why the study?
Does the Nissei DS-400 accurately measure blood pressure compared to mercury sphygmomanometry in adults in a low-resource setting?
Cross-Sectional (n=33)
Does the Nissei DS-400 accurately measure blood pressure compared to mercury sphygmomanometry in adults in a low-resource setting?
Mean Difference: 0.8
The Nissei DS-400 is an accurate, low-cost oscillometric blood pressure device suitable for use in low-resource settings.
Supports low-cost BP monitoring in low-resource settings; leaves open need for outcome studies before routine adoption.
OBJECTIVE: Hypertension affects approximately one billion individuals worldwide. The effective management of hypertension requires accurate measurement and monitoring of blood pressure. We evaluated the accuracy of a low cost self-measurement oscillometric device, with features suitable for use in a low-resource setting, in an adult population in the developing world according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. METHODS: Trained observers using a double-headed stethoscope took nine sequential same arm measurements from 33 participants, alternating between mercury sphygmomanometry and the test device. Anyone with an arrhythmia or unclear Korotkoff sounds was excluded. Data were analyzed according to the protocol guidelines. RESULTS: The device passed all the criteria of the International Protocol with 78/95/99 and 80/95/99 of systolic and diastolic differences, respectively, within 5/10/15 mmHg of the mercury standard. It also achieved the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation criteria with a mean difference (standard deviation) of 0.8 (4.4) mmHg and -0.9 (4.5) mmHg for systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Nissei DS-400 can be recommended for use in the adult population, particularly in the developing world. Its impressive performance may be related to theoretical factors within the patient population and environment (e.g. temperature, humidity and altitude) that could influence the device's performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duhig et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=33). Nissei DS-400 vs. Mercury sphygmomanometry was evaluated on Accuracy of blood pressure measurement according to International Protocol and AAMI criteria (MD 0.8 mmHg for SBP, -0.9 mmHg for DBP). The Nissei DS-400 blood pressure device met International Protocol and AAMI criteria for accuracy compared to mercury sphygmomanometry, with a mean systolic difference of 0.8 mmHg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: