Key result
Increasing end-expiratory lung volume reduces LVEDV by ~5% and lowers stroke volume versus resting breathing.
Why the study?
It was unknown how specific changes in different lung volumes modify left ventricular function.
Do changes in different lung volumes (EILV, EELV, Vt) modify left ventricular function and central hemodynamics in healthy individuals?
Do changes in different lung volumes (EILV, EELV, Vt) modify left ventricular function and central hemodynamics in healthy individuals?
Absolute Event Rate: 102% vs 107%
p-value: p=<0.05
Increases in end-inspiratory lung volume and tidal volume have little effect on central hemodynamics unless end-expiratory lung volume rises above functional residual capacity, which reduces left ventricular end-diastolic volume.
Elevated EELV may reduce LV filling and stroke volume in health; leaves open effects in cardiopulmonary disease.
Changes in lung volumes during breathing; at rest, exercise or in disease, alter pulmonary vascular resistance and challenge central hemodynamics. However, it is currently unknown how changes in different lung volumes (i.e. altering end inspiratory lung volume [EILV], end expiratory lung volume [EELV] or tidal volume [Vt]) specifically modify left ventricle (LV) function. Twenty-five healthy individuals (14:11 F:M, 24±4) performed an experimental visit with measures obtained during resting breathing followed by 5 randomized breathing challenges. Each challenge was performed with controlled Vt, breathing frequency, operational lung volumes and duty cycle while 2D echocardiographic imaging of LV end diastolic (LVEDV), end systolic (LVESV) and stroke volume (LVSV) were obtained. Images were also collected for analysis of LV geometry while tissue Doppler imaging and transmitral Doppler were obtained to assess LV myocardial function and filling. Increasing EELV, with Vt at resting levels and EILV reaching critical inspiratory reserve volume ([cIRV] i.e.~90%TLC) decreased LVEDV (107±24 vs. 102±29ml, p < 0.05) and LVSV (66±12 vs. 63±12ml, p<0.05), compared to resting breathing. The changes in central hemodynamics with this breathing pattern were also different from increasing EILV (below cIRV) with an unchanged EELV (p<0.05). Free wall curvature increased from baseline (p=0.03) with the elevated EELV and EILV, while lateral E’ and E/A ratio both decreased (p=0.001, p=0.018, respectively). Central hemodynamics were unchanged from resting breathing when increasing EILV solely through altering Vt (even when EILV reached cIRV), but lateral E’ decreased (p=0.001). During simulated exercise hyperpnea with a mild increase in EELV with EILV reaching cIRV , LVEDV (102±29 vs. 93 ± 26ml), LVESV (42±12 vs. 37±12ml) and SV (66±12 vs. 57±14ml) were reduced (p<0.05, for all) compared to baseline, but not when breathing with a similar pattern with EELV below FRC and EILV below cIRV. Lateral E’ and E/A ratio were reduced in both hyperpnea conditions (p<0.05). Our data demonstrates that increases in EILV and Vt appear to have little effect on central hemodynamics, unless EELV rises above FRC. Increasing EELV, likely reduces LVEDV through both series and direct ventricular interaction associated with external constraint of the LV, altering LV filling and relaxation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
JiaWen Lim (2026) studied Healthy (n=25). Increased end expiratory lung volume (EELV) with EILV reaching critical inspiratory reserve volume vs. Resting breathing was evaluated on Left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) (p=<0.05). Increasing end expiratory lung volume significantly decreased left ventricular end diastolic volume (102 vs 107 ml) and stroke volume compared to resting breathing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: