Key result
Post-ACS mental illness is linked to ~48% higher likelihood of not receiving LLT.
Why the study?
Real-world data on lipid-lowering therapy use and LDL-C target attainment after ACS remain limited in patients with mental disorders despite their increased cardiovascular morbidity.
Does the presence of mental illness affect lipid-lowering therapy utilization and LDL-C target attainment in patients following acute coronary syndrome?
Cohort (n=9,192)
Does the presence of mental illness affect lipid-lowering therapy utilization and LDL-C target attainment in patients following acute coronary syndrome?
Odds Ratio: 1.48
p-value: p=<0.01
Patients with mental illness experience significant disparities in the intensity and utilization of lipid-lowering therapies following an acute coronary syndrome, highlighting a critical gap in secondary prevention.
Background Despite increased cardiovascular morbidity among patients with mental disorders, real-world data on lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) use and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target attainment after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain limited. We evaluated disparities in LLT utilization and LDL-C target attainment among patients with and without mental disorders following ACS in a real-world setting. Methods Data of consecutive ACS hospitalizations in a large healthcare system (2013–2023) were analyzed. Patients were stratified by mental illness and compared with controls. LDL-C target attainment and LLT use were assessed at baseline and during early (1–4 months) and late (6–12 months) post-discharge periods. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated independent associations. Results Among 9,192 patients surviving ≥ 1 year after ACS, 32.1% had mental illness. These patients were older, more often female, and had higher atherosclerotic burden (p < 0.001). LDL-C target attainment was lower in patients with mental illness both early (49% vs. 54%) and late (44% vs. 49%) after discharge, with fewer achieving ≥ 50% LDL-C reduction (p < 0.001). High-intensity statin and early ezetimibe use were less frequent (p = 0.005), and non-adherence was higher (9.7% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.001). In adjusted analyses, mental illness was not independently associated with LDL-C target attainment but was linked to lower use of moderate- and high-intensity statins (OR 0.87 and 0.83) and higher likelihood of no LLT use (OR 1.48; p < 0.01). Conclusions Mental disorders were associated with lower LLT intensity and greater treatment gaps after ACS, without independent differences in LDL-C attainment. LDL-C control and combination LLT use remained suboptimal, highlighting persistent gaps in secondary prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Avidan et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=9,192). Mental illness vs. No mental illness was evaluated on No lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) use (OR 1.48, p=<0.01). Mental illness after acute coronary syndrome was associated with a higher likelihood of no lipid-lowering therapy use (OR 1.48, p<0.01), but not independently associated with LDL-C target attainment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: