Lupus anticoagulant (LAC) testing is central to antiphospholipid syndrome diagnostics and thrombotic risk assessment, but guideline-based workflows can be operationally complex, resource-intensive, and highly imbalanced. In our real-world cohort, completed LAC evaluations required an average of approximately 7 downstream clot-based assays, while nearly 90% of final classifications were negative. We developed and evaluated MINI-LAC™ (Minimal Lupus Anticoagulant), a biologically grounded digital decision-support framework designed for early exclusion of cases highly likely to yield negative final LAC classifications using routinely available pre-LAC coagulation parameters. Across 7454 LAC evaluations from a tertiary medical center, the phospholipid-poor versus phospholipid-rich activated partial thromboplastin time ratio (PTT-FSL/PTT-FS) demonstrated strong discrimination across LAC outcome categories ( p < 10 −53 ) and consistently emerged as the dominant predictive feature. In the independent prospective cohort and complete-case analyses, MINI-LAC achieved approximately 98% negative predictive value, with preserved performance in analyses not relying on imputation of the primary biomarker, while maintaining full guideline-based evaluation for all non-negative or uncertain cases. These findings support integration of biologically meaningful functional coagulation signals into digital laboratory decision support to improve efficiency in LAC diagnostics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khermesh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: