Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual exploration of how social organization impacts interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering education.
Engineering education increasingly relies on interdisciplinary project-based learning (PjBL) to prepare students for complex real-world problems. Yet bringing students from different disciplines together does not automatically produce interdisciplinary collaboration. This paper addresses a central question: under what conditions do interdisciplinary intentions translate into interdisciplinary practices and outcomes? The paper advances a theoretically grounded approach using the theory of practice architectures to analyse how collaboration is socially organised in practice. Rather than aiming at empirical generalisation, it presents a conceptual exploration illustrated through a single case from a master’s course in interdisciplinary teamwork. The analysis shows how the degree of task interdependence in the organisation of work shaped whether the students’ collaboration became interdisciplinary or remained multidisciplinary. By adopting a sociomaterial view of learning, the paper conceptualises learning as changes in shared practices rather than solely in individual competencies. The study contributes a process-oriented framework for understanding how interdisciplinary collaboration is enabled or constrained in engineering education contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sjølie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: