Key result
This paper describes the design of a randomized trial evaluating whether an interactive e-health platform and the HFM website improve self-care in 414 patients with heart failure.
Why the study?
Does an interactive e-health platform or the HFM website improve self-care in patients with heart failure compared to usual care?
RCT (n=414)
three-arm parallel
Yes
Does an interactive e-health platform or the HFM website improve self-care in patients with heart failure compared to usual care?
This study protocol outlines a randomized trial to evaluate whether an interactive e-health platform or the ESC/HFA website improves self-care and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients compared to usual care.
HFM website may modestly improve outcomes at lower cost in HF outpatients; leaves open whether adjusted e-health pathways merit adoption.
AIMS: Electronic health support (e-health) may improve self-care of patients with heart failure (HF). We aim to assess whether an adjusted care pathway with replacement of routine consultations by e-health improves self-care as compared with usual care. In addition, we will determine whether the ESC/HFA (European Society of Cardiology/Heart Failure Association) website heartfailurematters.org (HFM website) improves self-care when added to usual care. Finally, we aim to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. METHODS: A three-arm parallel randomized trial will be conducted. Arm 1 consists of usual care; arm 2 consists of usual care plus the HFM website; and arm 3 is the adjusted care pathway with an interactive platform for disease management (e-Vita platform), with a link to the HFM website, which replaces routine consultations with HF nurses at the outpatient clinic. In total, 414 patients managed in 10 Dutch HF outpatient clinics or in general practice will be included and followed for 12 months. Participants are included if they have had an established diagnosis of HF for at least 3 months. The primary outcome is self-care as measured by the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour scale (EHFScB scale). Secondary outcomes are quality of life, cardiovascular- and HF-related mortality, hospitalization, and its duration as captured by hospital and general practitioner registries, use of and user satisfaction with the HFM website, and cost-effectiveness. PERSPECTIVE: This study will provide important prospective data on the impact and cost-effectiveness of an interactive platform for disease management and the HFM website. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: unique identifier: NCT01755988.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagenaar et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Heart Failure (n=414). Adjusted care pathway with e-Vita platform and HFM website, or usual care plus HFM website vs. Usual care was evaluated on Self-care as measured by the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour scale (EHFScB scale). This paper describes the design of a randomized trial evaluating whether an interactive e-health platform and the HFM website improve self-care in 414 patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: