Key result
Intramuscular fat deposition predicted poor overall survival in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.
Why the study?
Although skeletal muscle quantity is linked to surgical outcomes, the role of skeletal muscle quality had remained unexamined in acute type A aortic dissection.
Does intramuscular fat deposition predict poor survival and functional decline in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection?
Cohort (n=324)
Does intramuscular fat deposition predict poor survival and functional decline in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection?
Skeletal muscle quality, as indicated by intramuscular fat deposition, is an independent predictor of poor long-term survival and functional decline after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Muscle quality assessment should not yet influence acute type A aortic dissection management; leaves open validation and interventional trials.
OBJECTIVES: Although skeletal muscle quantity is linked to surgical outcomes, quality remains unexamined. In this study, we evaluated whether skeletal muscle quality and quantity could predict surgical outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). METHODS: Skeletal muscle quality and quantity were evaluated using computed tomography (CT) values and the psoas muscle mass index, respectively. From May 2004 to December 2017, 324 ATAAD patients underwent aortic replacement after CT scans and psoas muscle mass index measurements. Patients were grouped into intramuscular fat (IMF; n = 55) and non-IMF (n = 269) deposition groups. RESULTS: The mean ages of the patients were 72.3 ± 9.7 and 66.8 ± 12.1 years (P = 0.002), and hospital mortality rates were 3.6% (2/55) and 7.4% (20/269; P = 0.393) for IMF and non-IMF deposition groups, respectively. IMF deposition was a risk factor for a deterioration in activities of daily living at discharge by multivariable analysis [odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16-0.69; P = 0.003]. The mean follow-up was 43.9 ± 36.8 months. The 5-year survival was significantly worse for the IMF deposition group (IMF 73.8% vs non-IMF 88.2%; P = 0.010). The multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that IMF deposition significantly predicted poor survival (hazard ratio 3.26, 95% CI 1.47-7.24; P = 0.004), unlike psoas muscle mass index and age. CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal muscle quality, defined by IMF deposition, was an independent predictor of overall survival and postoperative activities of daily living dependence risk in patients undergoing surgery for ATAAD. Thus, IMF deposition may be an additional risk factor for estimating late outcomes of ATAAD surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gomibuchi et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) (n=324). Intramuscular fat (IMF) deposition vs. Non-IMF deposition was evaluated on Overall survival (HR 3.26, 95% CI 1.47-7.24, p=0.004). Intramuscular fat deposition predicted poor overall survival in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: