Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates MRD negativity predictors, clinical outcomes in multiple myeloma patients after ASCT, suggesting significant implications.
Measurable residual disease (MRD) is a powerful prognostic tool in multiple myeloma, but predictors of achieving MRD negativity after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are not well defined. We studied 814 patients who achieved at least a very good partial response after ASCT between January 2016 and January 2023 and underwent MRD assessment by next-generation flow cytometry (median sensitivity 2.4x10−6). Overall, 48% (n=387) achieved MRD negativity post-ASCT. The presence of t(11;14) (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.2; p<0.01) and pre-transplant response less than complete remission (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.7; p<0.01) independently predicted MRD positivity. MRD-positive patients had inferior progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.53-2.58; p<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.10-2.28; p=0.009). Despite lower MRD-negative rate, 5-year PFS was similar among t(11;14) MRD-positive (58%) and MRD-negative (63%); p=0.12. The adverse prognostic effect of high-risk cytogenetics (HRCA) on 5-year PFS appears partially mitigated in MRD-negative patients, 5-year PFS was 73% in those without ≥2 HRCA compared with 55% in those with ≥2 HRCA (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.3; p=0.01). In the MRD-positive cohort, 5-year PFS was 53% in patients without ≥2 HRCA versus 17% in those with ≥2 HRCA (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.6-3.6; p<0.01). Additionally, higher residual clonal plasma cell burden within MRD-positive disease was associated with inferior PFS (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-6.9; p=0.002). This study highlights that presence of t(11;14) independently predicts MRD positivity post-ASCT, although it does not significantly impact prognosis in this subgroup.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolarinwa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: