Assesses energy storage system consistency, suggesting a new adaptive assessment method.
Cell inconsistency constrains the usable capacity, operational safety, and service life of large-scale battery energy storage systems. Most online methods infer inconsistency from voltage, current, or temperature; in parallel branches, however, self-balancing currents redistribute the operating current and can obscure its external signatures. This paper proposes a mode-adaptive assessment method based on circulating-current impedance. Circuit analysis reveals how open-circuit-voltage and resistance differences reverse the circulating-current direction among discharge, idle, and charge. The signed branch response is combined with each cell voltage to form a topology-conditioned cell-level quasi-impedance, which is mapped to a 0–100 consistency score by mode-specific rules. In controlled 6P3S experiments, the predefined resistance-disturbed cells received the two lowest scores in both same-cluster and cross-cluster scenarios; on the same 18-cell records, a baseline-corrected peak-temperature-rise feature did not place either disturbed pair among the two highest-ranked cells. Update times remained at the millisecond level for both 18- and 1200-cell configurations. A field application produced 17.328 million valid cell–window evaluations and persistent cluster-level screening patterns. These results support a physically interpretable and computationally lightweight approach to topology-conditioned cell inconsistency screening. Because independent fault labels were unavailable, the field evidence establishes operational scalability rather than diagnostic accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: