Key result
Targeting the survival activating factor enhancement (SAFE) pathway, which involves STAT3 activation by pro-inflammatory cytokines, may offer a novel therapeutic approach for heart failure.
Why the study?
Does targeting the SAFE pathway provide preventive and/or therapeutic benefits for the treatment of heart failure?
Does targeting the SAFE pathway provide preventive and/or therapeutic benefits for the treatment of heart failure?
This review highlights the paradoxical cardioprotective role of pro-inflammatory cytokines via the SAFE pathway, suggesting a novel therapeutic target for heart failure.
May support SAFE pathway targeting in heart failure; leaves open efficacy pending randomized trials.
The cytokine hypothesis presently suggests that an excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF) and interleukin 6 (IL6), contributes to the pathogenesis of heart failure. The concept, successfully proved in genetically modified animal models, failed to translate to humans. Recently, accumulation of apparently paradoxical experimental data demonstrates that, under certain conditions, production of pro-inflammatory cytokines can initiate the activation of a pro-survival cardioprotective signalling pathway. This novel path that involves the activation of a transcription factor, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), has been termed the survival activating factor enhancement (SAFE) pathway. In this review, we will discuss whether targeting the SAFE pathway may be considered as a preventive and/or therapeutic measure for the treatment of heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lecour et al. (2011) conducted a review in Heart failure. Targeting the SAFE pathway was evaluated. Targeting the survival activating factor enhancement (SAFE) pathway, which involves STAT3 activation by pro-inflammatory cytokines, may offer a novel therapeutic approach for heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: