Key result
Continuous infusion of furosemide produced a more consistent and sustained diuresis compared with intermittent bolus doses, but without a significant difference in total urine output or electrolytes.
Why the study?
Does continuous intravenous infusion of furosemide improve diuresis compared to intermittent bolus doses in patients following cardiac surgery?
Does continuous intravenous infusion of furosemide improve diuresis compared to intermittent bolus doses in patients following cardiac surgery?
Continuous infusion of furosemide is an effective and safe method of diuresis following cardiac surgery, offering more consistent diuresis than intermittent boluses without differences in total urine output or electrolyte changes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continuous furosemide infusion may provide steadier diuresis; leaves open superiority on net output or outcomes versus boluses.
OBJECTIVE: To review the literature regarding the efficacy and safety of continuous intravenous infusion of loop diuretics following cardiac surgery. DATA SOURCES: Articles were identified through a MEDLINE search (1966-March 2006) using the key words furosemide, bumetanide, torsemide, ethacrynic acid, loop diuretics, continuous infusions, intravenous infusions, surgery, cardiac surgery, cardiovascular surgery, and thoracic surgery. Search results were limited to studies in human subjects published in English. Additional references were identified through review of the bibliographies of the articles cited. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All clinical trials and observational reports identified that evaluated or described the efficacy and/or safety of a continuous infusion of a loop diuretic in adult or pediatric patients who had undergone cardiac surgery were included in this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Loop diuretics are often used to promote diuresis following cardiac surgery. Studies in patients who have undergone cardiac surgery have demonstrated that a more consistent and sustained diuresis is produced by a continuous infusion of furosemide compared with intermittent bolus doses of furosemide. However, there does not appear to be a significant difference in total urine output or change in serum electrolyte levels when furosemide is administered as a continuous infusion compared with intermittent bolus doses. CONCLUSIONS: A continuous infusion of furosemide is an effective and safe method of diuresis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gulbis et al. (2006) conducted a review in Cardiac surgery. Continuous intravenous infusion of furosemide vs. Intermittent bolus doses of furosemide was evaluated on Diuresis, total urine output, and change in serum electrolyte levels. Continuous infusion of furosemide produced a more consistent and sustained diuresis compared with intermittent bolus doses, but without a significant difference in total urine output or electrolytes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: