Key result
Continuous furosemide infusion during CPB fails to reduce acute kidney injury vs. bolus dosing.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether continuous furosemide administration during cardiopulmonary bypass in minimally invasive cardiac surgery reduces the incidence of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury.
Does continuous furosemide infusion during cardiopulmonary bypass reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury in adults undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery?
RCT (n=100)
Single-blind
Simple randomization with a random number generator
No
Does continuous furosemide infusion during cardiopulmonary bypass reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury in adults undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery?
Continuous furosemide administration during cardiopulmonary bypass does not reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury but significantly increases postoperative urine output and improves the PaO2/FiO2 ratio.
Objectives : This study aimed to assess whether continuous furosemide administration during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) reduces the incidence of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods : A total of 100 patients undergoing MICS with CPB were randomly assigned to receive either continuous furosemide infusion or no continuous furosemide during CPB. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AKI. Secondary endpoints included the cardiac surgery-associated neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (CSA-NGAL) score, urine output within 12 h postoperatively, postoperative furosemide dose requirements, red blood cell transfusion volume, PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital, and in-hospital mortality. Results : AKI occurred in 8 patients (16%) in the continuous furosemide group and in 6 patients (12%) in the non-continuous group (relative risk, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.23–2.23). Among the secondary endpoints, urine output within the first 3 h postoperatively and the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio were significantly higher in the continuous furosemide group. However, subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusions : Continuous furosemide administration during CPB did not effectively reduce the incidence of AKI. However, it was associated with a significant increase in postoperative urine output and an improvement in the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takeichi et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Acute kidney injury following minimally invasive cardiac surgery (n=100). Continuous furosemide vs. Non-continuous furosemide (single 10 mg bolus) was evaluated on Incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) within 48 hours postoperatively (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.23-2.23, p=0.330). Continuous furosemide administration during cardiopulmonary bypass did not significantly reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury compared to a single bolus dose (16% vs 12%; RR 0.72).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: