Key result
Ultrasound speckle tracking demonstrated strong correlation with sonomicrometry for radial (r=0.91-0.95), longitudinal (r=0.73-0.93), and circumferential (r=0.90) strain estimation in vitro.
Why the study?
Does ultrasound speckle tracking accurately estimate radial, longitudinal, and circumferential strain in carotid artery phantoms compared to sonomicrometry?
Does ultrasound speckle tracking accurately estimate radial, longitudinal, and circumferential strain in carotid artery phantoms compared to sonomicrometry?
Effect estimate: r=0.91 to 0.95
p-value: p=<0.001
Ultrasound speckle tracking is a feasible and accurate method for assessing carotid artery strain, demonstrating good agreement with sonomicrometry in an in vitro phantom model.
In vitro validation supports speckle tracking feasibility; leaves open clinical translation for arterial stiffness assessment.
Ultrasound speckle tracking for carotid strain assessment has in the past decade gained interest in studies of arterial stiffness and cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to validate and directly contrast carotid strain assessment by speckle tracking applied on clinical and high-frequency ultrasound images in vitro. Four polyvinyl alcohol phantoms mimicking the carotid artery were constructed with different mechanical properties and connected to a pump generating carotid flow profiles. Gray-scale ultrasound long- and short-axis images of the phantoms were obtained using a standard clinical ultrasound system, Vivid 7 (GE Healthcare, Horten, Norway) and a high-frequency ultrasound system, Vevo 2100 (FUJIFILM, VisualSonics, Toronto, Canada) with linear-array transducers (12L/MS250). Radial, longitudinal and circumferential strains were estimated using an in-house speckle tracking algorithm and compared with reference strain acquired by sonomicrometry. Overall, the estimated strain corresponded well with the reference strain. The correlation between estimated peak strain in clinical ultrasound images and reference strain was 0.91 (p<0.001) for radial strain, 0.73 (p<0.001) for longitudinal strain and 0.90 (p<0.001) for circumferential strain and for high-frequency ultrasound images 0.95 (p<0.001) for radial strain, 0.93 (p<0.001) for longitudinal strain and 0.90 (p<0.001) for circumferential strain. A significant larger bias and root mean square error was found for circumferential strain estimation on clinical ultrasound images compared to high frequency ultrasound images, but no significant difference in bias and root mean square error was found for radial and longitudinal strain when comparing estimation on clinical and high-frequency ultrasound images. The agreement between sonomicrometry and speckle tracking demonstrates that carotid strain assessment by ultrasound speckle tracking is feasible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larsson et al. (2014) studied this question. Ultrasound speckle tracking (clinical and high-frequency) vs. Sonomicrometry (reference strain) was evaluated on Correlation between estimated peak strain and reference strain (r=0.91 to 0.95, p=<0.001). Ultrasound speckle tracking demonstrated strong correlation with sonomicrometry for radial (r=0.91-0.95), longitudinal (r=0.73-0.93), and circumferential (r=0.90) strain estimation in vitro.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: