Key result
The tonometric subendocardial viability ratio was not impaired in elderly hypertensive patients with increased aortic stiffness compared to controls (1.35 vs 1.39).
Why the study?
Does increased aortic stiffness (high pulse pressure) impair the tonometric subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR) in elderly hypertensive patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=203)
Does increased aortic stiffness (high pulse pressure) impair the tonometric subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR) in elderly hypertensive patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.35% vs 1.39%
Tonometric SEVR is not impaired in elderly hypertensive patients with increased aortic stiffness and is mainly determined by the diastolic-to-systolic time ratio rather than aortic pressure.
SEVR appears preserved in elderly hypertensives with aortic stiffness; hypothesis-generating for diastolic-to-systolic time ratio as primary SEVR determinant.
Increased aortic stiffness predisposes to myocardial ischaemia by increasing the systolic tension-time index and by decreasing aortic pressure throughout diastole. The tonometric subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR) is a non-invasive estimate of myocardial perfusion relative to cardiac workload. The hypothesis that SEVR is impaired in elderly hypertensives with high aortic pulse pressure (PP) was tested in the present study. 2. The SEVR was calculated by radial applanation tonometry in 203 subjects. In addition, diastolic time (DT), systolic time (ST) and mean diastolic and systolic aortic pressures (Pd and Ps, respectively) were calculated. First, 60 subjects matched for age and gender were analysed (20 controls, 20 hypertensives with pulse pressure (PP) < or = 60 mmHg, 20 hypertensives with PP > 60 mmHg; mean (+/-SD) age 64 +/- 9 years; 24 women, 36 men). The remaining 143 subjects, aged 53 +/- 10 years, were analysed subsequently. 3. The SEVR was similar in the three elderly groups (1.39 +/- 0.34, 1.39 +/- 0.28 and 1.35 +/- 0.25, in controls and hypertensive patients with PP < or = 60 and > 60 mmHg, respectively). The SEVR was positively related to DT/ST (r(2) = 0.89) and to DT (r(2) = 0.73) and was negatively related to heart rate (r(2) = 0.56; P < 0.001 each). However, SEVR was not related to ST, PP, mean Pd or mean Ps. At a given DT/ST, SEVR tended to be lower in hypertensives with PP > 60 mmHg than in hypertensives with normal PP. The positive linear relationship between SEVR and DT/ST was confirmed in the remaining 143 subjects (r(2) = 0.90), with no influence of aortic pressure. 4. The tonometric SEVR was not impaired in elderly hypertensive patients with increased aortic stiffness. In resting elderly and middle-aged individuals, the tonometric SEVR was mainly related to DT/ST ratio, not to aortic pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chemla et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension with increased aortic stiffness (n=203). Increased aortic stiffness (Pulse pressure > 60 mmHg) vs. Normotensive controls and hypertensives with pulse pressure ≤ 60 mmHg was evaluated on Subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR). The tonometric subendocardial viability ratio was not impaired in elderly hypertensive patients with increased aortic stiffness compared to controls (1.35 vs 1.39).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: