Key result
Continuous warfarin during AF catheter ablation reduced thromboembolic complications compared to warfarin discontinuation with heparin bridging (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.05-0.23; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does continuous therapeutic warfarin reduce periprocedural complications in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation compared to warfarin discontinuation with heparin bridging?
Systematic Review (n=27,402)
Does continuous therapeutic warfarin reduce periprocedural complications in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation compared to warfarin discontinuation with heparin bridging?
Performing atrial fibrillation ablation under continuous therapeutic warfarin significantly reduces periprocedural thromboembolic and minor bleeding complications compared to bridging with heparin.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports uninterrupted warfarin during AF ablation to minimize thromboembolism; confirms Level 1 meta-analytic superiority over heparin bridging.
BACKGROUND: Observational data suggest that performing radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) under therapeutic warfarin (continuous warfarin [CW]) may reduce the periprocedural risk of complications, such as thromboembolic events, compared to warfarin discontinuation (DW) with periprocedural bridging with heparin. We systematically reviewed the available evidence on the impact of CW compared with DW on periprocedural complications of AF catheter ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched major Web databases for studies on radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF under CW versus DW with periprocedural bridging with heparin. Data on periprocedural complications were extracted. We identified 9 studies (1 large case series indirectly compared with the latest Worldwide Survey). A total of 27,402 patients were included in the analysis (6400 undergoing ablation with CW). CW was associated with a striking decrease of thromboembolic complications (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.05-0.23; P<0.001) and minor bleeding complications (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21-0.71; P=0.002) compared with DW. CW also did not increase the risk of major bleeding (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.31-1.43; P=0.30), including cardiac tamponade (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.19-2.47; P=0.57). CONCLUSIONS: There is highly consistent evidence from observational studies that a CW strategy during radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF reduces the risk of thromboembolic complications without increasing the risk of bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santangeli et al. (2012) conducted a systematic review in Atrial fibrillation (n=27,402). Continuous warfarin vs. Warfarin discontinuation with periprocedural bridging with heparin was evaluated on Thromboembolic complications (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.05-0.23, p=<0.001). Continuous warfarin during AF catheter ablation reduced thromboembolic complications compared to warfarin discontinuation with heparin bridging (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.05-0.23; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: