Key result
Radiofrequency ablation with posterior wall isolation resulted in similar arrhythmia-free survival compared to cryoballoon ablation alone.
Why the study?
Patients with persistent AF and scarred or low voltage left atrial myocardium have suboptimal outcomes and poor durability after PVI, leaving clinical outcomes including the role of PWI unclear.
Does radiofrequency PVI with posterior wall isolation improve arrhythmia-free survival compared to cryoballoon PVI alone in patients with persistent AF undergoing protocol-mandated redo ablation?
RCT (n=38)
randomised
No
Does radiofrequency PVI with posterior wall isolation improve arrhythmia-free survival compared to cryoballoon PVI alone in patients with persistent AF undergoing protocol-mandated redo ablation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with persistent AF and left atrial scar, achieving durable PVI via a protocol-mandated redo procedure significantly improved quality of life and NT-proBNP, though adding posterior wall isolation offered no additive benefit for arrhythmia-free survival.
BACKGROUND: Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with scarred/low voltage left atrial myocardium have suboptimal outcomes following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). In the LAUDABLE study, we showed that PVI durability in these patients is poor. Here, we report follow-up outcomes from LAUDABLE, including relevance of posterior wall isolation (PWI), quality of life (QOL) and cardiac dysfunction as measured by N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). METHODS: LAUDABLE was a single-centre, pilot randomised controlled study. Patients with persistent AF were randomised to cryoballoon (CB) PVI or contact force and local impedance guided radiofrequency (RF) PVI. Patients underwent a protocol mandated 2-month redo procedure to isolate reconnected PVs. The index RF group additionally underwent PWI during the redo procedure. Arrhythmia follow-up included daily handheld ECGs, clinical review, QOL questionnaires and NT-proBNP analysis at 12 months. RESULTS: 38 patients underwent both procedures (17 CB/PVI-only, 21 RF/PVI+PWI). Over median 303 day follow-up, arrhythmia-free survival was observed in 23 (61%) patients, similar between arms (Kaplan-Meier estimate: CB/PVI-only 58.8% [95% CI 38.8-87.5%] vs RF/PVI+PWI 61.9% [95% CI 44.3-86.6%]; p=0.788). Significant improvements in QOL (AFEQT baseline: 61 vs follow-up: 96; p<0.001) and NT-proBNP (baseline: 535pg/mL vs follow-up: 151pg/mL; p=0.004) were observed. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with significant left atrial scar at index ablation, who may be considered unsuitable for redo, derived significant benefit following durable PVI in terms of arrhythmia burden, QOL and NT-proBNP. Accepting low patient numbers, PWI offered no additive benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calvert et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in persistent atrial fibrillation (n=38). Radiofrequency (RF) PVI + PWI vs. Cryoballoon (CB) PVI-only was evaluated on arrhythmia-free survival (p=0.788). Radiofrequency ablation with posterior wall isolation resulted in similar arrhythmia-free survival compared to cryoballoon ablation alone.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: