Key result
Patients with diabetes mellitus exhibited significant differences in both frequency and time domain measures of heart rate variability compared to healthy volunteers.
Why the study?
Does heart rate variability (HRV) differ between patients with diabetes mellitus and healthy volunteers?
Case-Control (n=32)
Does heart rate variability (HRV) differ between patients with diabetes mellitus and healthy volunteers?
Time and frequency domain analysis of heart rate variability can effectively detect autonomic nervous dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is frequently characterized by autonomic nervous dysfunction. Analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) has become a popular noninvasive tool for assessing the activities of autonomic nervous system (ANS). In this paper, changes in ANS activity are quantified by means of frequency and time domain analysis of R-R interval variability. Electrocardiograms (ECG) of 16 patients suffering from DM and of 16 healthy volunteers were recorded. Frequency domain analysis of extracted normal to normal interval (NN interval) data indicates significant difference in very low frequency (VLF) power, low frequency (LF) power and high frequency (HF) power, between the DM patients and control group. Time domain measures, standard deviation of NN interval (SDNN), root mean square of successive NN interval differences (RMSSD), successive NN intervals differing more than 50 ms (NN50 Count), percentage value of NN50 count (pNN50), HRV triangular index and triangular interpolation of NN intervals (TINN) also show significant difference between the DM patients and control group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seyd et al. (2008) conducted a case-control in Diabetes Mellitus (n=32). Diabetes Mellitus vs. Healthy volunteers was evaluated on Heart rate variability (frequency and time domain measures). Patients with diabetes mellitus exhibited significant differences in both frequency and time domain measures of heart rate variability compared to healthy volunteers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: