Key result
Biomarker-derived HFrEF endotype 4 linked to ~40% greater risk of mortality or HF hospitalization.
Why the study?
Distinct subtypes of HFrEF patients with different clinical profiles and treatment responses based on biomarker profiles were not well characterized.
Does the response to uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapy differ across biomarker-derived endotypes in patients with HFrEF?
Population
1802 HFrEF patients from BIOSTAT-CHF and 813 in independent validation cohort
Comparison
Uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapy across six biomarker-derived endotypes
Design
Unsupervised cluster analysis in cohort study with validation
Authors
Loading...
Biomarker-derived endotypes may enable personalized HFrEF therapy; extends clustering methods to treatment-response prediction.
Cohort (n=2,615)
Does the response to uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapy differ across biomarker-derived endotypes in patients with HFrEF?
Hazard Ratio: 1.4 (95% CI 1.1–1.8)
Biomarker-based endotyping in HFrEF identifies distinct patient subgroups with varying risks of adverse outcomes and differential responses to uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapy.
Tromp et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=2,615). Biomarker-based endotypes (Endotype 4) vs. Other endotypes was evaluated on All-cause mortality or hospitalization for HF (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8). Biomarker-based cluster analysis identified six distinct HFrEF endotypes, with endotype 4 having the highest risk for all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.8).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: