Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 15, 2018European Heart JournalOpen Access

Novel endotypes in heart failure: effects on guideline-directed medical therapy

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Biomarker-derived HFrEF endotype 4 linked to ~40% greater risk of mortality or HF hospitalization.

  • HR 1.4
  • 95% CI 1.1-1.8
  • n=2,615

Why the study?

Distinct subtypes of HFrEF patients with different clinical profiles and treatment responses based on biomarker profiles were not well characterized.

Does the response to uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapy differ across biomarker-derived endotypes in patients with HFrEF?

Population

1802 HFrEF patients from BIOSTAT-CHF and 813 in independent validation cohort

Comparison

Uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapy across six biomarker-derived endotypes

Design

Unsupervised cluster analysis in cohort study with validation

Authors

Jasper Tromp
Jasper TrompHeart Failure / Cardiomyopathy
Wouter Ouwerkerk
Wouter OuwerkerkHeart Failure / Cardiomyopathy
BDBiniyam G. DemisseiHoward University Hospital

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Biomarker-derived endotypes may enable personalized HFrEF therapy; extends clustering methods to treatment-response prediction.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=2,615)

Structured PICO

Does the response to uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapy differ across biomarker-derived endotypes in patients with HFrEF?

P
Population
2,615 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (1,802 in derivation and 813 in validation cohorts) analyzed to identify biomarker-based endotypes.
E
Exposure
Uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapy (ACEi/ARB and beta-blockers)
C
Comparator
Different biomarker-derived endotypes (1 through 6)
O
Outcome
Composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failurecomposite

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 1.4 (95% CI 1.1–1.8)

Biomarker-based endotyping in HFrEF identifies distinct patient subgroups with varying risks of adverse outcomes and differential responses to uptitration of guideline-directed medical therapy.

Cite This Study

Tromp et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=2,615). Biomarker-based endotypes (Endotype 4) vs. Other endotypes was evaluated on All-cause mortality or hospitalization for HF (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8). Biomarker-based cluster analysis identified six distinct HFrEF endotypes, with endotype 4 having the highest risk for all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.8).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6af418050bc01bbbcb4da3https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy712

Topics

HFrEF treatmentHeart failureHeart failure hospitalizationHFpEF management
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of Enalapril on Mortality in Severe Congestive Heart Failure1987 · 5,137 citations
  2. 2Phenomapping for Novel Classification of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction2014 · 1,166 citations
  3. 3Phenotypic and pathophysiological heterogeneity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction2012 · 106 citations
  4. 4Effect of Enalapril on Survival in Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions and Congestive Heart Failure1991 · 8,072 citations
  5. 5NbClust : An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set2014 · 3,543 citations