Key result
Subcutaneous pelvic fat thickness had an inverse association with abdominal aorta calcium score (B = -21.23, P<.001), while visceral fat had a direct association in females (B = 84.28, P=.001).
Why the study?
The impact of adipose tissue, including visceral and subcutaneous fat, on abdominal aorta calcification was not fully established.
Does adipose tissue distribution impact abdominal aorta calcification in patients undergoing non-enhanced CT?
Observational (n=492)
Does adipose tissue distribution impact abdominal aorta calcification in patients undergoing non-enhanced CT?
Effect estimate: B = -21.23
p-value: p=<.001
Visceral fat and subcutaneous pelvic fat have opposing associations with abdominal aorta calcification, suggesting a lipotoxic effect of visceral fat and a protective role of subcutaneous pelvic fat on atherosclerotic processes.
Opposing fat depot associations with aortic calcification should not change practice; leaves open differential effects on atherosclerosis.
Cardiovascular (CV) morbidity, atherosclerosis, and obesity are all targets of clinical concern and vast research, as is the association between them. Aim of this study is to assess the impact of adipose tissue (including visceral and subcutaneous fat) on abdominal aorta calcification measured on non-enhanced computed tomography (CT). We retrospectively included 492 patients who underwent non-enhanced CT scans during workup for clinically suspected renal colic. All scans were reviewed for abdominal aorta calcification, liver attenuation, and thickness of visceral and subcutaneous fat. Multivariate general linear regression models were used to assess the association between abdominal aorta calcium score and adiposity measures. In the model that included only adiposity measures; visceral fat thickness had statistically significant direct association with abdominal aorta calcium score (B = 67.1, P <.001), whereas subcutaneous pelvic fat thickness had a significant inverse association with abdominal aorta calcium score (B = -22.34, P <.001). Only the association of subcutaneous pelvic fat thickness with abdominal aorta calcium score remained statistically significant when controlling for age, sex, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia (B = -21.23, P <.001). In this model, the association of visceral fat remained statistically significant in females (B = 84.28, P = .001) but not in males (B = 0.47, P = .973). Visceral fat thickness and subcutaneous pelvic fat thickness were found to have opposing associations with abdominal aorta calcium score. This suggests that while visceral fat may have a lipotoxic effect on aortic atherosclerotic processes, subcutaneous pelvic fat may have a protective role in these processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldenberg et al. (2018) conducted an observational in clinically suspected renal colic (n=492). Adipose tissue (visceral and subcutaneous fat thickness) was evaluated on abdominal aorta calcium score (B = -21.23, p=<.001). Subcutaneous pelvic fat thickness had an inverse association with abdominal aorta calcium score (B = -21.23, P<.001), while visceral fat had a direct association in females (B = 84.28, P=.001).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: