Key result
Amiodarone significantly prolonged the atrial effective refractory period and shortened the duration of burst pacing-induced atrial fibrillation to 12% of control values in dogs with chronic atrioventricular block, whereas candesartan had no significant effect.
Why the study?
Does amiodarone or candesartan improve atrial electrophysiological parameters in a dog model of chronic atrioventricular block?
Does amiodarone or candesartan improve atrial electrophysiological parameters in a dog model of chronic atrioventricular block?
Amiodarone, but not candesartan at the tested dose, exerts favorable electropharmacological effects against atrial fibrillation in a canine model of chronic heart failure.
Electropharmacological effects of chronically administered amiodarone and candesartan on atria that had been remodeled against congestive heart failure were assessed using dogs (about 10 kg in weight) with chronic atrioventricular block. Amiodarone was administered orally in a dose of 200 mg/body per day for the initial 7 days followed by 100 mg for the following 21 days (n = 7). Candesartan was administered in a dose of 12 mg/body per day for 28 days (n = 7). All animals survived the 4-week experimental period, indicating the lack of risks for inducing cardiohemodynamic collapse or torsade de pointes by these drugs. The plasma amiodarone concentration was 353 ng/ml at 4 weeks of treatment. Before candesartan treatment (control), intravenous administration of 30 ng/kg of angiotensin II increased the mean blood pressure by 18 mmHg, which was significantly decreased to 1 mmHg by 4 weeks of treatment. Amiodarone prolonged the atrial effective refractory period without affecting inter-atrial conduction time and decreased the duration of the burst pacing-induced atrial fibrillation, whereas candesartan hardly affected these variables. These results indicate that amiodarone should become a pragmatic pharmacological strategy against atrial fibrillation in patients with chronically compensated heart failure and suggest that a much higher dose of candesartan may be needed to exert its efficacy in this model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2007) studied Chronic atrioventricular block (animal model) (n=14). Amiodarone vs. Pre-drug baseline and Candesartan was evaluated on Duration of burst pacing-induced atrial fibrillation (p=<0.05). Amiodarone significantly prolonged the atrial effective refractory period and shortened the duration of burst pacing-induced atrial fibrillation to 12% of control values in dogs with chronic atrioventricular block, whereas candesartan had no significant effect.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: