Key result
Type 2 diabetes was associated with higher common carotid artery intima-media thickness compared to healthy controls (709 vs 640 μm, P < .0001), likely reflecting adaptive remodeling.
Why the study?
Does type 2 diabetes mellitus alter carotid geometry and circumferential wall stress compared to healthy controls?
Case-Control (n=266)
Does type 2 diabetes mellitus alter carotid geometry and circumferential wall stress compared to healthy controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 709% vs 640%
p-value: p=< .0001
Increased carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes may represent adaptive remodeling to counteract increased pulsatile strain and maintain normal circumferential wall stress, rather than solely reflecting early atherosclerosis.
Suggests carotid remodeling in T2DM may normalize wall stress rather than mark atherosclerosis; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective confirmation.
CONTEXT: Hyperglycemia is associated with a higher carotid intima-media thickness (IMT); however, it is not established whether this increase reflects early atherosclerotic changes or adaptive remodeling responding to hyperglycemia-induced alteration in mechanical properties of the arterial wall. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to compare carotid geometry and circumferential wall stress between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and healthy controls and to evaluate the associations between chronic glucose exposure and measures of arterial structure and function. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a case-control and cross-sectional study within institutional practice. PARTICIPANTS: PARTICIPANTS included 133 T2DM patients free of cardiovascular complications and 133 healthy controls with normal glucose metabolism, matched for sex, age, and body mass index. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Common carotid artery (CCA) IMT, luminal diameter, wave speed, and local pulse pressure (PP) were evaluated. RESULTS: As compared with controls, T2DM patients had higher (P < .0001) CCA IMT (640 ± 81 vs 709 ± 118 μm), luminal diameter (6.12 ± 0.67 vs 6.69 ± 0.56 mm), and brachial PP (47 ± 7 vs 57 ± 12 mm Hg), whereas luminal radius to IMT ratio (4.8 ± 0.7 vs 4.8 ± 0.8, P = .57) and circumferential wall stress (49.0 ± 8.3 vs 50.6 ± 10.3 kPa, P = .26) were comparable between the 2 groups. In T2DM patients, glycosylated hemoglobin was independently related to CCA wave speed and local PP, but not to IMT that was determined by age, local PP, and luminal diameter. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the increase in IMT associated with a higher glucose exposure might reflect adaptive remodeling counteracting an increase in pulsatile strain and preventing increase in circumferential wall stress caused by luminal enlargement of stiff arteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kozàkovà et al. (2014) conducted a case-control in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=266). Type 2 diabetes mellitus vs. Healthy controls with normal glucose metabolism was evaluated on Common carotid artery intima-media thickness (μm) (p=< .0001). Type 2 diabetes was associated with higher common carotid artery intima-media thickness compared to healthy controls (709 vs 640 μm, P < .0001), likely reflecting adaptive remodeling.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: