Key result
About 20% of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer present with emergency symptoms, which are strongly associated with poor prognostic factors including advanced tumor stage and metastatic disease.
Why the study?
There is a lack of published literature and dedicated guidelines addressing the emergency presentation and management of rectal cancer.
This narrative review provides flow charts for managing rectal cancer emergencies and highlights their association with poor prognostic factors.
Emergency rectal cancer presentations demand urgent intervention; review leaves open standardized protocols for perforation-dominant cases.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed cancer worldwide and the second most common cause of cancer death. About 20% of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer present with emergency symptoms. Typical symptoms include acute bleeding, obstruction, and perforation. These emergency situations can be life-threatening and may lead to decreased life expectancy and quality of life. Bowel perforation is the most common cause of emergency presentation, followed by obstruction and acute bleeding. This narrative review analyzes the existing literature regarding the acute presentation of rectal cancer, producing three flow charts for the management of the main rectal emergencies. The treatment of acute bleeding differs based on the hemodynamic status. Treatment for bowel perforation or occlusion differs depending on whether the lesion is intraperitoneal or extraperitoneal. Emergency presentations seem to be strongly associated with several poor prognostic factors, including lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and high-grade or poorly differentiated tumors. An association between emergency presentation and larger tumor size, advanced tumor stage, node-positive disease, and metastatic disease is reported in the literature. The difference between colon and rectal cancer, both in terms of treatment and prognosis, has been widely acknowledged. Thus, comprehensive studies and dedicated guidelines are needed, considering the lack of literature published about rectal cancer in an emergency setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pajola et al. (2024) conducted a review in Rectal cancer. Emergency presentation was evaluated. About 20% of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer present with emergency symptoms, which are strongly associated with poor prognostic factors including advanced tumor stage and metastatic disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: