Key result
Vertebral left atrial size was a significantly more accurate predictor of congestive heart failure than vertebral heart size (AUC 0.92 vs 0.85; P=0.03) in dogs with respiratory signs.
Why the study?
Differentiating cardiogenic from noncardiogenic causes of respiratory signs can be challenging when echocardiography is unavailable, prompting comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of VLAS and VHS to predict left-sided CHF.
Does radiographic vertebral left atrial size (VLAS) improve diagnostic accuracy for left-sided congestive heart failure compared to vertebral heart size (VHS) in dogs with respiratory signs?
Cross-Sectional (n=114)
Does radiographic vertebral left atrial size (VLAS) improve diagnostic accuracy for left-sided congestive heart failure compared to vertebral heart size (VHS) in dogs with respiratory signs?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-0.96)
p-value: p=.03
In dogs with respiratory signs, radiographic vertebral left atrial size (VLAS) is a more accurate predictor of left-sided congestive heart failure than vertebral heart size (VHS).
May aid differentiation of cardiogenic respiratory signs in dogs without echocardiography; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Differentiating cardiogenic vs noncardiogenic causes of respiratory signs can be challenging when echocardiography is unavailable. Radiographic vertebral left atrial size (VLAS) and vertebral heart size (VHS) have been shown to predict echocardiographic left heart size, with VLAS specifically estimating left atrial size. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Compare the diagnostic accuracy of VLAS and VHS to predict left-sided congestive heart failure (CHF) in dogs presenting with respiratory signs. ANIMALS: One-hundred fourteen dogs with respiratory signs and radiographic pulmonary abnormalities. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Dogs had to have an echocardiogram and thoracic radiographs obtained within 24 hours. Diagnosis of CHF was confirmed based on the presence of respiratory signs, cardiac disease, LA enlargement, and cardiogenic pulmonary edema. RESULTS: Fifty-seven dogs had CHF and 57 did not have CHF. Compared to VHS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.91), VLAS was a significantly (P = .03) more accurate predictor of CHF (AUC, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96). Optimal cutoff for VLAS was >2.3 vertebrae (sensitivity, 93.0%; specificity, 82.5%). Murmur grade (P = .02) and VLAS (P < .0001) were independently associated with CHF and VHS was not. Increased VHS (54%) was significantly (P = .01) more common than increased VLAS (24%) in dogs without CHF. Results were similar in a subsample of older and smaller dogs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: When echocardiography is unavailable, VLAS and murmur grade have clinically utility to aid in differentiating cardiogenic from noncardiogenic respiratory signs. These findings might be especially useful to help rule out CHF in dogs with increased VHS that present with respiratory signs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ross et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Respiratory signs and radiographic pulmonary abnormalities (suspected congestive heart failure) (n=114). Vertebral left atrial size (VLAS) vs. Vertebral heart size (VHS) was evaluated on Prediction of left-sided congestive heart failure (CHF) (AUC 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.96, p=.03). Vertebral left atrial size was a significantly more accurate predictor of congestive heart failure than vertebral heart size (AUC 0.92 vs 0.85; P=0.03) in dogs with respiratory signs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: