Key result
The radiographic left atrial dimension (RLAD) accurately detected left atrial enlargement with an AUC of 0.97, demonstrating 93.5% sensitivity and 96.8% specificity at an optimal cut-off of 1.8 vertebrae.
Why the study?
Left atrial dimensions reflect mitral regurgitation severity, motivating the evaluation of a new radiographic measurement (radiographic left atrial dimension) for detecting left atrial enlargement in dogs.
Does radiographic left atrial dimension (RLAD) accurately detect left atrial enlargement compared to echocardiography in dogs?
Cross-Sectional (n=77)
Yes
Does radiographic left atrial dimension (RLAD) accurately detect left atrial enlargement compared to echocardiography in dogs?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.9691% vs 0.9425%
p-value: p=0.274
RLAD is a simple, highly sensitive, and specific radiographic measurement for evaluating left atrial dimensions and detecting left atrial enlargement in dogs.
RLAD may aid radiographic LAE detection in canine MR; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: The dimensions of the left atrium in cases with mitral regurgitation are an indirect measurement of its severity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the value of a new radiographic measurement, the radiographic left atrial dimension (RLAD), for detecting left atrial enlargement (LAE) in dogs. Thirty one dogs without LAE and 46 dogs with LAE were recruited in a prospective fashion. Reference left atrium dimension was measured by standard left atrium to aorta ratio (LA/Ao) by 2D echocardiography. LAE was considered if LA/Ao > 1.6. Left atrium dimension was then quantified on lateral radiographs by measuring RLAD. Vertebral heart size (VHS) was measured and RLAD was obtained by drawing a line bisecting the 90 degrees angle defined by the long and short cardiac axes lines of the VHS, up to the dorsal edge of the left atrium and comparing its length to T4's vertebral body length. The correlation of VHS and RLAD methods with LA/Ao was estimated, as well as their sensitivity and specificity for detecting LAE. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to estimate the optimal decision criteria for each method. RESULTS: = 0.82). RLAD's sensitivity and specificity for detecting LAE when evaluated at the optimal cut-off value, 1.8 vertebrae, were 93.5 and 96.8% respectively. RLAD showed high reproducibility and repeatability. CONCLUSION: RLAD appears to be a clinically useful radiographic measurement for evaluating left atrial dimensions. RLAD would provide clinicians with a simple and cost-effective tool for evaluating and monitoring LAE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salguero et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Left atrial enlargement / Myxomatous mitral valve disease (n=77). Radiographic left atrial dimension (RLAD) vs. Vertebral heart size (VHS) was evaluated on Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detecting left atrial enlargement (95% CI 0.9281-1.00, p=0.274). The radiographic left atrial dimension (RLAD) accurately detected left atrial enlargement with an AUC of 0.97, demonstrating 93.5% sensitivity and 96.8% specificity at an optimal cut-off of 1.8 vertebrae.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: