Key result
Symptomatic patients with ≥50% carotid artery stenosis had a significantly higher expansive remodeling ratio compared to asymptomatic patients (1.64 vs 1.41; P=0.02).
Why the study?
Is expansive carotid artery remodeling associated with cerebral ischemic symptoms in patients with significant carotid stenosis?
Population
108 patients with ≥50% internal carotid artery stenosis evaluated by MDCT angiography, including 37…
Comparison
Symptomatic presentation vs Asymptomatic presentation
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Expansive remodeling was associated with symptoms; hypothesis-generating for vulnerability and requires prospective validation.
Cross-Sectional (n=108)
Is expansive carotid artery remodeling associated with cerebral ischemic symptoms in patients with significant carotid stenosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.64% vs 1.41%
p-value: p=.02
Expansive carotid remodeling assessed by MDCT is significantly greater in symptomatic patients with significant internal carotid artery stenosis compared to asymptomatic patients, suggesting a link to plaque vulnerability.
Hardie et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Carotid artery disease with ≥50% stenosis (n=108). Symptomatic presentation (cerebral ischemic symptoms) vs. Asymptomatic presentation was evaluated on Remodeling ratio (RR) (p=.02). Symptomatic patients with ≥50% carotid artery stenosis had a significantly higher expansive remodeling ratio compared to asymptomatic patients (1.64 vs 1.41; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: