Key result
Positive remodeling in carotid artery plaques was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of stroke compared with negative remodeling (p < 0.05).
Why the study?
Does positive remodeling assessed by MDCT and MR predict future stroke events in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis?
Observational (n=28)
Does positive remodeling assessed by MDCT and MR predict future stroke events in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis?
p-value: p=<0.05
Combined analysis of remodeling ratio, remodeling index, and relative signal intensity using MDCT and MR can identify vulnerable carotid plaques and potentially predict future stroke events.
Positive remodeling may flag higher-risk carotid plaques on imaging; leaves open prospective validation for incident stroke prediction.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of assessing positive remodeling for predicting future stroke events in the internal carotid artery. We therefore assessed narrowing of the carotid artery lumen using multidetector-row computer tomography (MDCT) angiography and carotid plaque characteristics using black-blood (BB) magnetic resonance (MR). METHODS: We retrospectively selected 17 symptomatic and 11 asymptomatic lesions with luminal narrowing >50%. We compared remodeling parameters of luminal stenosis (remodeling ratio, RR/remodeling index, RI) using MDCT and MR intensities of atherosclerotic plaque contents using the BB technique (relative signal intensity, rSI). We also confirmed the validity of the relationship between MR intensity and atherosclerotic plaque contents by histology. The levels of biological markers related to vessel atherosclerosis were measured. RESULTS: Plaque lesions with positive remodeling in carotid arteries were associated with a significantly higher prevalence of stroke compared with plaques with negative remodeling (p < 0.05). Radiologic and histologic analyses determined that plaques with positive remodeling had higher signal intensities (with respect to their lipid-rich content or to hemorrhage) compared with negative remodeling (correlation coefficients: RI and rSI, r = 0.41, p < 0.05; RR and rSI, r = 0.50, p < 0.05). Levels of biological markers, including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, hemoglobin A1C, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, were not useful for predicting stroke events. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the combined analysis of RR, RI and rSI could potentially help to predict future stroke events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miura et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Internal carotid artery stenosis (n=28). Positive remodeling vs. Negative remodeling was evaluated on Prevalence of stroke (p=<0.05). Positive remodeling in carotid artery plaques was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of stroke compared with negative remodeling (p < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: