Key result
White-coat hypertension was associated with lower high-frequency power (P<.03) and greater LF/HF ratios (P<.03) compared to normotension, indicating attenuated parasympathetic control.
Why the study?
Does white-coat hypertension associate with abnormal autonomic-cardiac regulation compared to normotension?
Cross-Sectional (n=120)
Does white-coat hypertension associate with abnormal autonomic-cardiac regulation compared to normotension?
p-value: p=<.03
White-coat hypertension is associated with autonomic dysregulation, specifically diminished parasympathetic tone, similar to that seen in persistent hypertension.
May warrant closer monitoring in white-coat hypertension; leaves open whether autonomic measures improve risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: White-coat hypertension, defined as high blood pressure (BP) on clinical assessment but normal BP elsewhere or on ambulatory measurement, is a common but poorly understood phenomenon. The current study asks whether individuals with white-coat hypertension have abnormal autonomic-cardiac regulation, similar to that observed in sustained or persistent hypertension. METHODS: Participants were men (ages 40 to 70 years; 63% white, 37% African American) not receiving any cardiovascular medications who were classified as persistent hypertensive (n = 40), white-coat hypertensive (n = 40), or normotensive (n = 40) on the basis of clinic and daytime ambulatory BP, using a threshold criterion for hypertension of 140/90 mmHg. Persistent and white-coat hypertensive subjects were matched on ethnicity and clinic BP, and white-coat hypertensive subjects and normotensive subjects were matched on race and daytime ambulatory BP. Frequency domain analysis of resting beat-to-beat heart rate variability (HRV) was used to estimate parasympathetic and sympathetic control of the heart. RESULTS: Relative to normotensive subjects, both persistent and white-coat hypertensive subjects had lower high-frequency (HF) (P < .03) and low-frequency (LF) power (P < .051) and thus less parasympathetic activity. In addition, white-coat and persistent hypertensive subjects had significantly greater LF/HF ratios, indicating greater sympathetic-to-parasympathetic activity, as compared with normotensive subjects (P < .03). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest similarities between persistent and white-coat hypertensive subjects reflecting attenuated parasympathetic control of the heart. In addition, the association between white-coat hypertension and autonomic dysregulation, particularly diminished parasympathetic tone, may serve as a mechanism for increased risk for cardiovascular events in affected individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neumann et al. (2005) conducted a cross-sectional in White-coat hypertension (n=120). White-coat hypertension vs. Normotension was evaluated on High-frequency (HF) power, low-frequency (LF) power, and LF/HF ratios from resting beat-to-beat heart rate variability (p=<.03). White-coat hypertension was associated with lower high-frequency power (P<.03) and greater LF/HF ratios (P<.03) compared to normotension, indicating attenuated parasympathetic control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: