Key result
Atrial fibrillation during delivery was associated with an almost 20-fold increased risk of all-cause in-hospital mortality compared to deliveries without atrial fibrillation (OR 19.12).
Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation is rare during pregnancy, and data regarding its impact during delivery remain scarce.
Does a secondary diagnosis of atrial fibrillation increase all-cause in-hospital mortality and resource utilization in pregnant patients undergoing delivery?
Cohort (n=17,785,980)
Yes
Does a secondary diagnosis of atrial fibrillation increase all-cause in-hospital mortality and resource utilization in pregnant patients undergoing delivery?
Odds Ratio: 19.12 (95% CI 4.33–84.45)
p-value: p=<0.001
Atrial fibrillation during delivery is associated with a nearly 20-fold increased risk of in-hospital mortality and significantly higher rates of resource utilization, blood transfusions, and intubation.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is rare during pregnancy and current data on the impact of AF during delivery is scarce. In this study, we aim to analyze the impact of AF in patients who underwent delivery via cesarean section (CS), natural spontaneous delivery (NSD), or instrumental delivery (ID). METHODS: This study analyzed discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2020. Using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) and Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) codes, this study identified patients who underwent CS, NSD, or ID with a secondary diagnosis of AF. The study then compared these patients with patients who underwent CS, NSD, or ID without a secondary diagnosis of AF to analyze various outcomes. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, total hospital charges, blood transfusions, and respiratory failure requiring endotracheal intubation. STATA v.13 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX) was used for univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 17,785,980 patients underwent CS, NSD, or ID. Of these deliveries, 6,000 patients had a secondary diagnosis of AF. Patients with AF had almost 20 times more of a chance of dying while admitted compared to those without AF (OR: 19.12; 95% CI: 4.33-84.45; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the AF cohort stayed for one and a half days longer in the hospital (regression coefficient: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.16-1.94; p < 0.001), spent 19,294.05 more dollars (regression coefficient: 19294.05; 95% CI: 14658.17-23929.93; p < 0.001), were subjected 2.68 times more to blood transfusions (OR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.89-3.8; p < 0.001), and had a higher rate of respiratory complications requiring endotracheal intubation (OR: 15.86; 95% CI: 7.83-32.15; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: AF has a substantial negative impact on inpatient outcomes for pregnant patients during delivery. Further research is needed to explore these negative impacts to improve maternal care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siochi et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Pregnancy delivery (cesarean section, natural spontaneous delivery, or instrumental delivery) (n=17,785,980). Atrial fibrillation vs. No atrial fibrillation was evaluated on All-cause in-hospital mortality (OR 19.12, 95% CI 4.33-84.45, p=<0.001). Atrial fibrillation during delivery was associated with an almost 20-fold increased risk of all-cause in-hospital mortality compared to deliveries without atrial fibrillation (OR 19.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: