Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 1, 1998Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Postshock Potential Gradients and Dispersion of Repolarization in Cells Stimulated with Monophasic and Biphasic Waveforms

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

In computer models of reciprocally polarized cells, biphasic stimuli caused a smaller dispersion of repolarization (1611 msec2 vs 1835 msec2) compared to monophasic stimuli.

Why the study?

Does biphasic stimulation cause a more uniform response than monophasic stimulation in computer models of isolated ventricular cells?

Population

Two computer models of an isolated ventricular cell simulating rapid pacing and elevated [K]o

Comparison

5-msec/5-msec symmetric biphasic stimuli… vs 10-msec rectangular monophasic stimuli delivered…

Design

Preclinical

Authors

Eric A. Sobie
Eric A. SobieElectrophysiology
LTLeslie TungElectrophysiology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Supports biphasic waveform modeling to reduce dispersion; leaves open clinical translation from computational data.

Structured PICO

Does biphasic stimulation cause a more uniform response than monophasic stimulation in computer models of isolated ventricular cells?

P
Population
Two computer models of an isolated ventricular cell (reciprocally polarized and uniformly polarized cells) simulating rapid pacing and elevated [K]o
I
Intervention
5-msec/5-msec symmetric biphasic stimuli delivered in the relative refractory period
C
Comparator
10-msec rectangular monophasic stimuli delivered in the relative refractory period
O
Outcome
Response duration and postshock transmembrane potential (Vm), including spatial gradients and dispersion of repolarizationsurrogate

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 1611% vs 1835%

Computer modeling suggests biphasic defibrillation waveforms cause a more uniform response in relatively refractory cardiac cells under reciprocal polarization, potentially explaining their greater efficacy in preventing refibrillation.

Cite This Study

Sobie et al. (1998) studied Ventricular fibrillation. Biphasic stimuli vs. Monophasic stimuli was evaluated on Dispersion of repolarization (with reciprocal polarization). In computer models of reciprocally polarized cells, biphasic stimuli caused a smaller dispersion of repolarization (1611 msec2 vs 1835 msec2) compared to monophasic stimuli.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6c210847a1bfb288f36ae8https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1998.tb00961.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of activation during ventricular fibrillation and following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in open-chest dogs.1990 · 117 citations
  2. 2Ventricular refractory period extension caused by defibrillation shocks.1990 · 118 citations
  3. 3Cardiac responses to premature monophasic and biphasic field stimuli1995 · 18 citations
  4. 4Reduced Arrhythmogenicity of Biphasic Versus Monophasic T-Wave Shocks1996 · 35 citations
  5. 5Response of relatively refractory canine myocardium to monophasic and biphasic shocks.1991 · 73 citations