Key result
In computer models of reciprocally polarized cells, biphasic stimuli caused a smaller dispersion of repolarization (1611 msec2 vs 1835 msec2) compared to monophasic stimuli.
Why the study?
Does biphasic stimulation cause a more uniform response than monophasic stimulation in computer models of isolated ventricular cells?
Population
Two computer models of an isolated ventricular cell simulating rapid pacing and elevated [K]o
Comparison
5-msec/5-msec symmetric biphasic stimuli… vs 10-msec rectangular monophasic stimuli delivered…
Design
Preclinical
Authors
Loading...
Supports biphasic waveform modeling to reduce dispersion; leaves open clinical translation from computational data.
Does biphasic stimulation cause a more uniform response than monophasic stimulation in computer models of isolated ventricular cells?
Absolute Event Rate: 1611% vs 1835%
Computer modeling suggests biphasic defibrillation waveforms cause a more uniform response in relatively refractory cardiac cells under reciprocal polarization, potentially explaining their greater efficacy in preventing refibrillation.
Sobie et al. (1998) studied Ventricular fibrillation. Biphasic stimuli vs. Monophasic stimuli was evaluated on Dispersion of repolarization (with reciprocal polarization). In computer models of reciprocally polarized cells, biphasic stimuli caused a smaller dispersion of repolarization (1611 msec2 vs 1835 msec2) compared to monophasic stimuli.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: