Key result
Intravenous iloprost was as effective as prostacyclin in lowering pulmonary vascular resistance, achieving similar haemodynamic effects at a lower mean maximum dose (3.4 vs 6 ng/kg/min).
Why the study?
Does intravenous iloprost improve cardiac output and pulmonary vascular resistance compared to prostacyclin in patients with severe primary pulmonary hypertension?
RCT (n=12)
Open-label
Random order
Does intravenous iloprost improve cardiac output and pulmonary vascular resistance compared to prostacyclin in patients with severe primary pulmonary hypertension?
Intravenous iloprost is as effective as prostacyclin in acutely lowering pulmonary vascular resistance in severe primary pulmonary hypertension, requiring a lower dose.
Supports iloprost as lower-dose alternative for acute PVR reduction in severe primary PH; confirms efficacy parity with prostacyclin in RCT.
Summary Twelve patients with severe primary pulmonary hypertension and pronounced disability unresponsive to oral vasolidators were assessed as to their suitability for heart‐lung transplantation. During routine right heart catheterisation, intravenous infusions of both prostacyclin (PG1 2 ) and its synthetic analogue, iloprost (IL), were given in random order. The dose of each drug was increased whilst the improvements in cardiac output (Q) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were recorded. The maximum rate of each infusion was determined by the onset of side effects or a fall in mean systemic blood pressure of more than 20 per cent. The mean maximum dose of PG1 2 was 6 + 2 ng/kg/min and that of IL 3.4 ± 1.8 ng/kg/min, and both infusions achieved similar haemodynamic effects. In this open, randomised study, intravenous IL was as effective as prostacyclin in lowering PVR, but with a lower infused dose. Iloprost may have an important role in the acute assessment of patients with primary pulmonary hypertension, and when available for prescription should be assessed as an alterative long‐term intravenous vasodilator to prostacyclin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scott et al. (1990) conducted an RCT in Severe primary pulmonary hypertension (n=12). Iloprost vs. Prostacyclin (6 ± 2 ng/kg/min) was evaluated on Improvements in cardiac output and pulmonary vascular resistance. Intravenous iloprost was as effective as prostacyclin in lowering pulmonary vascular resistance, achieving similar haemodynamic effects at a lower mean maximum dose (3.4 vs 6 ng/kg/min).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: