Key result
INSPIRIS RESILIA valve shows ~95% three-year survival in patients under 60.
Why the study?
Three-year safety and clinical outcomes needed to be assessed in patients younger than 60 years undergoing bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve intervention.
Does bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement with the INSPIRIS RESILIA valve provide safety and stable haemodynamic performance at 3 years in patients under 60 years?
Observational (n=415)
Yes
Does bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement with the INSPIRIS RESILIA valve provide safety and stable haemodynamic performance at 3 years in patients under 60 years?
The INSPIRIS RESILIA bioprosthetic aortic valve demonstrates excellent safety, stable haemodynamics, and improved quality of life at 3 years in patients under 60 years.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three-year registry data support RESILIA bioprosthesis safety in patients <60; leaves open need for longer randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: We report three-year safety and clinical outcomes in patients younger than 60 years undergoing bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve intervention. METHODS: The INSPIRIS RESILIA Durability Registry (INDURE) is a prospective, multicentre registry to assess clinical outcomes of patients under 60 years. Patients with planned surgical aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta and/or coronary bypass surgery were included. Time-related valve safety, haemodynamic performance, and quality-of-life (QoL) at three years were assessed. RESULTS: The study cohort included 415 patients with a mean age of 53.5 years, 76.9% being male and 27.1% in New York Health Association (NYHA) class III/IV. Outcomes after three years included cardiovascular-related mortality (0.4%), thromboembolic events (0.6%), valve-related bleeding (0.0%) and new permanent pacemaker implantation (0.4%). QoL increased over the time course of the study from baseline to three-year follow-up. Three-year freedom from all-cause mortality was 95.4% (95% CI 93.3-97.6), and 84.5% were NYHA I versus 22.0% at baseline. No patient developed haemodynamic valve deterioration stage 3. The mean aortic pressure gradient was 13.7 mmHg at three years, and the mean effective orifice area was 1.8 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The three-year data from the INSPIRIS RESILIA valve demonstrate reassuring safety findings and stable haemodynamic performance as well as a high QoL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paulis et al. (2026) conducted an observational in planned surgical aortic valve replacement (n=415). INSPIRIS RESILIA bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve was evaluated on Time-related valve safety, haemodynamic performance, and quality-of-life (QoL) at three years. In patients under 60 years, the INSPIRIS RESILIA bioprosthetic aortic valve demonstrated 95.4% freedom from all-cause mortality (95% CI 93.3-97.6) and low cardiovascular mortality (0.4%) at 3 years.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: