Key result
The presence of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI is associated with attenuated improvement of left ventricular geometry and filling pressure after aortic valve replacement, with tissue Doppler imaging e' serving as an independent predictor (OR 0.078).
Why the study?
Does the presence of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI predict attenuated improvement in left ventricular geometry and filling pressure after aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Population
41 patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular systolic function scheduled to…
Comparison
Presence of late gadolinium enhancement on… vs Absence of late gadolinium enhancement on…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
12 months
Authors
Loading...
LGE on CMR may identify limited post-AVR remodeling in severe AS; hypothesis-generating for CMR-guided decisions pending prospective trials.
Cohort (n=41)
No
Does the presence of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI predict attenuated improvement in left ventricular geometry and filling pressure after aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Odds Ratio: 0.078 (95% CI 0.007–0.888)
p-value: p=0.040
The presence of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI in patients with severe aortic stenosis predicts a lack of favorable left ventricular reverse remodeling and filling pressure improvement after aortic valve replacement.
Park et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular systolic function (n=41). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) vs. Absence of LGE was evaluated on Presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE+) predicted by tissue Doppler imaging e' (OR 0.078, 95% CI 0.007-0.888, p=0.040). The presence of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI is associated with attenuated improvement of left ventricular geometry and filling pressure after aortic valve replacement, with tissue Doppler imaging e' serving as an independent predictor (OR 0.078).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: