Key result
After a mean follow-up of 108 months post-pacemaker implantation, 85% of patients with complete AV block remained in complete block, and 71% with second-degree AV block progressed to complete block.
Why the study?
How does atrioventricular conductivity change over long-term follow-up in patients with second- or third-degree AV block after pacemaker implantation?
Observational (n=54)
How does atrioventricular conductivity change over long-term follow-up in patients with second- or third-degree AV block after pacemaker implantation?
Most patients with complete AV block do not recover conductivity, and second-degree intra-His or infra-His block tends to progress to complete AV block over long-term follow-up.
Supports indefinite pacing needs in AV block; extends prior data but leaves open recovery predictors in observational cohorts.
UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term course of conductivity in patients with second- or third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block after pacemaker implantation. Fifty-four patients (30 males and 24 females, mean age 59.5 years) had a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recorded prior to pacemaker implantation and again after a follow-up of more than 5 years (mean 108 months). The degree of AV block and the morphology of the QRS complex in the two ECGs were compared. Twenty-eight (85%) of the 33 patients with complete AV block and 15 (71%) of the 21 patients with second-degree AV block before implantation showed complete AV block after the follow-up period. The progression of AV block was recognized only in patients with intra-His (BH) or infra-His (H-V) block. In 29 patients, escape QRS complexes were recorded in both ECGs. A change in the QRS complex was noted in 6 patients (21%), including 2 with new bundle branch block (BBB), 2 with wider BBB, 1 with new left axis deviation, and 1 with a change to another BBB. This change was particularly notable in the H-V block group (44%). IN CONCLUSION: (1) Most patients with complete AV block did not recover AV conductivity after the long-term follow-up. (2) Second-degree BH and H-V block tended to progress to complete AV block.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sumiyoshi et al. (1995) conducted an observational in Second- or third-degree atrioventricular block (n=54). Long-term follow-up post-pacemaker implantation vs. Baseline (prior to pacemaker implantation) was evaluated on Degree of AV block and morphology of the QRS complex. After a mean follow-up of 108 months post-pacemaker implantation, 85% of patients with complete AV block remained in complete block, and 71% with second-degree AV block progressed to complete block.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: