Key result
Contrast echocardiography underestimated pulmonary transit time compared to cardiac MRI (bias ~1.4 seconds), though the modalities were significantly correlated (r = 0.65; P = 0.01).
Why the study?
The correlation of pulmonary transit time (PTT) between contrast echocardiography and cardiac MRI across cardiac disease has not been quantified, and the impact of region of interest (ROI) location and size is unknown.
Does contrast echocardiography provide comparable pulmonary transit time measurements to cardiac MRI?
Cross-Sectional (n=14)
Does contrast echocardiography provide comparable pulmonary transit time measurements to cardiac MRI?
Effect estimate: r = 0.65
p-value: p=0.01
Contrast echocardiography systematically underestimates pulmonary transit time compared to cardiac MRI, but shows significant correlation and is robust to variations in region of interest placement.
May enable PTT assessment by echocardiography in research; leaves open standardization and clinical utility.
INTRODUCTION: The degree of correlation of pulmonary transit time (PTT) between contrast echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) across the spectrum of cardiac disease has not been quantified. In addition, the degree to which PTT estimates are affected by variation in location and size of regions of interest (ROI) is unknown. METHODS: Pulmonary transit time was obtained using an inflection point technique from individuals that underwent contrast echocardiography and cardiac MRI. Right ventricular, left atrial, and left ventricular ROIs were evaluated, and two sizes for each ROI were used. The Spearman correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis were used for comparisons between modalities. Bland-Altman plots were also used to measure the impact of ROI size and location on transit times. RESULTS: Fourteen participants (age: 27-64 years; LV ejection fraction: 30%-60%) underwent both studies a median of 1 week apart. The correlation between modalities was significant for PTT (r = 0.65; P = 0.01) and normalized PTT (r = 0.80; P = 0.001). Cardiac MRI yielded transit times consistently higher than contrast echocardiography (bias ~ 1.4 seconds), but the discordance was not dependent on transit time magnitude. Low bias was observed for comparisons of ROI size and location (<0.5 seconds). CONCLUSIONS: Contrast echocardiography underestimates transit time measurements obtained by cardiac MRI, although the discrepancy was systematic and may have been contributed to by the interval between imaging studies. ROI location and size did not impact transit time values, suggesting that ROIs could be placed without intensive training, a step toward incorporation of real-time PTT measurement into echocardiographic laboratory workflow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monahan et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiac disease (n=14). Contrast echocardiography vs. Cardiac MRI was evaluated on Pulmonary transit time (PTT) (r = 0.65, p=0.01). Contrast echocardiography underestimated pulmonary transit time compared to cardiac MRI (bias ~1.4 seconds), though the modalities were significantly correlated (r = 0.65; P = 0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: