Key result
Invasive physiologic assessment and provocation tests provide comprehensive information to identify the underlying mechanisms of INOCA and guide mechanism-specific management.
Why the study?
INOCA patients often suffer from recurrent chest pain without adequate management and have poor outcomes, making identification and mechanistic discrimination of endotypes critical for tailored therapy.
Invasive physiologic assessment and provocation tests are essential for identifying the specific underlying mechanisms of INOCA to guide targeted management.
Endotype-specific evaluation in INOCA may refine management; leaves open whether targeted therapies improve outcomes.
In daily clinical practice, physicians often encounter patients with angina or those with evidence of myocardial ischemia from noninvasive tests but not having obstructive coronary artery disease. This type of ischemic heart disease is referred to as ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). INOCA patients often suffer from recurrent chest pain without adequate management and are associated with poor clinical outcomes. There are several endotypes of INOCA, and each endotype should be treated based on its specific underlying mechanism. Therefore, identifying INOCA and discriminating its underlying mechanisms are important issues and of clinical interest. Invasive physiologic assessment is the first step in the diagnosis of INOCA and discriminating the underlying mechanism; additional provocation tests help physicians identify the vasospastic component in INOCA patients. Comprehensive information acquired from these invasive tests can provide a template for mechanism-specific management for patients with INOCA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2023) conducted a review in Ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). Invasive physiologic assessment and provocation tests was evaluated. Invasive physiologic assessment and provocation tests provide comprehensive information to identify the underlying mechanisms of INOCA and guide mechanism-specific management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: