Key result
Implantable loop recorder monitoring in patients with cryptogenic stroke detected atrial fibrillation in 13.45% at 6 months and 25.98% at 36 months.
Why the study?
To provide data on implantable loop recorder-based AF rates, recurrent stroke rates, and predictors of AF in patients with cryptogenic stroke after 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up.
What is the rate of atrial fibrillation detection using implantable loop recorders in patients with cryptogenic stroke over time?
Meta-Analysis (n=3,377)
What is the rate of atrial fibrillation detection using implantable loop recorders in patients with cryptogenic stroke over time?
Implantable loop recorders detect atrial fibrillation in approximately one-quarter of patients with cryptogenic stroke by 3 years, highlighting their utility especially in older patients and those with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores.
Supports prolonged ILR monitoring in cryptogenic stroke, especially older patients with high CHA₂DS₂-VASc; extends time-dependent AF detection data for trials.
Objective: The objective of this study was to provide data on implantable loop recorder (ILR)-based atrial fibrillation (AF) rates, recurrent stroke rates, and predictors of AF in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS) after 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up. Methods: We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Web of Science, and reference lists of retrieved reports, which were published by April 30, 2023, which was the date of our last search. We utilized random-effects meta-analysis for detection rates, and meta-regression analysis, t -test (for normally distributed variables), and Mann-Whitney (for skewed variables) for predictor factors. Results: Thirteen studies were analyzed, which included data from 3,377 patients with CS or embolic stroke of undetermined source. The ILR-based AF rates in patients with CS were 4.73% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.91–5.71) at 1 month, 13.45% (95% CI 12.19–14.81) at 6 months, 17.5% (95% CI 16.25–18.82) at 12 months, 20.69% (95% CI 19–22.49) at 24 months, and 25.98% (95% CI 23.21–28.58) at 36 months. Age and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score were positively associated with AF detection. Specifically, the mean difference of age and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score in the group with AF versus the group without AF was 7.47 (95% CI 4.58–10.36, P < 0.001) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.22–1.28, P = 0.01), respectively. Finally, AF detection was positively associated with recurrent strokes with an estimated risk ratio of 1.27 (95% CI 0.69–2.31). Conclusions: There is a correlation between AF detection rate and ILR monitoring duration. One out of eight patients was diagnosed with AF after 6 months of follow-up and about one quarter after 3 years. Our results demonstrate the critical use of ILRs, especially in older patients, and in patients with high CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mavromoustakou et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Cryptogenic stroke or embolic stroke of undetermined source (n=3,377). Implantable loop recorder (ILR) was evaluated on ILR-based atrial fibrillation (AF) rate at 36 months (95% CI 23.21-28.58). Implantable loop recorder monitoring in patients with cryptogenic stroke detected atrial fibrillation in 13.45% at 6 months and 25.98% at 36 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: