Key result
Implanted loop recorders detect paroxysmal AF in ~24% of ESUS patients at 12 months.
Why the study?
Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation often escapes detection in embolic strokes of undetermined source, and its detection could guide oral anticoagulation therapy.
Does monitoring with implantable loop recorders detect paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with embolic strokes of undetermined source?
Cohort (n=233)
No
Does monitoring with implantable loop recorders detect paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with embolic strokes of undetermined source?
Implantable loop recorders detected paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in 24% of ESUS patients at 12 months, with higher predictive value in older patients and those with an elevated stroke risk analysis index.
May support ILR monitoring decisions in ESUS; extends prior trial detection rates but leaves open outcome benefits.
BACKGROUND: Arial fibrillation (AF) plays a role in approximately one-third of ischemic strokes. In embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation often escapes detection; if detected, it could be an indication for oral anticoagulation. In the ARTESiA trial, the absolute benefit of anticoagulation was higher in patients who had already had a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) than in those who had not. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 233 consecutive ESUS patients at the Jena University Hospital who had received an implanted loop recorder (ILR) over the period 2021-2025. We additionally provide a narrative review on the detection rates associated with various monitoring strategies based on pertinent publications that were retrieved by a literature search. RESULTS: The 12-month detection rate of paroxysmal AF was 24.0% (56/233, 95% confidence interval [19.0; 29.9]). 73.2% of the initial detections were within the first 90 days. All patients in whom AF was detected were orally anticoagulated. The 12-month detection rate was higher than in the CRYSTAL-AF trial (12.4%) and the PER-DIEM trial (15.3%), but lower than was reported by Pikija et al. (31.3%). The cutoff values with the highest positive predictive value were a stroke risk analysis (SRA) index of 2 or above (38.4%) and age 75 or above (37.9%). CONCLUSION: Early, risk-adapted diagnostic testing with ILR in selected ESUS patients can detect clinically relevant AF. Advanced age and an elevated SRA index may be useful patient selection criteria. A robust number needed to treat (NNT) for the ILR strategy cannot be derived from the available one-armed registry data. The indication for ILR should be linked to its therapeutic relevance, the probability of detecting AF, and the individual hemorrhagic risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagner et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS) (n=233). Implanted loop recorder (ILR) was evaluated on 12-month detection rate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (95% CI 19.0-29.9). In patients with embolic strokes of undetermined source, an implanted loop recorder detected paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in 24.0% (95% CI 19.0-29.9) at 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: