Key result
In hemodialysis patients monitored with implantable loop recorders, the annualized rate of bradycardia/asystole was 0.19, significantly higher than the rate of sustained VT/VF (0.02, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Establishing the frequency and nature of arrhythmias in hemodialysis patients is important to improve outcomes, prompting this characterization of arrhythmia frequency in maintenance hemodialysis.
What is the incidence of arrhythmias detected by implantable loop recorders in adult patients on maintenance hemodialysis?
Systematic Review (n=317)
What is the incidence of arrhythmias detected by implantable loop recorders in adult patients on maintenance hemodialysis?
In hemodialysis patients monitored with implantable loop recorders, bradycardia and asystole occur significantly more frequently than ventricular arrhythmias.
Emphasizes bradyarrhythmia monitoring over tachyarrhythmias in hemodialysis; extends ILR meta-analysis for targeted risk stratification.
Introduction Establishing the frequency and nature of arrhythmias in hemodialysis (HD) is an important step in improving outcomes of these patients. We undertook this systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize arrhythmia frequency in maintenance HD patients. Methods We identified studies on arrhythmias in adult patients on maintenance HD detected via implantable loop recorders (ILRs). Studies included were in English and reported ILR-detected arrhythmia incidence in HD patients. Data were extracted by one author using electronic spreadsheets and verified by a second author. Random effects models were used for pooled inferences. The I 2 statistic was used to quantify heterogeneity. Results Five studies qualified for inclusion (317 patients). The overall estimates for the annualized rate of death and sudden cardiac death (SCD) was 0.14 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11–0.18) and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.03–0.10), respectively. Across all 5 studies, the combined annualized rate of patients experiencing at least 1 bradycardia/asystole event was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.11–0.33) but heterogeneity was high ( I 2 = 79.8%). The average annualized rate of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes (0.02, 95% CI: 0.01–0.05) was significantly lower ( P < 0.001) than the rate of bradycardia/asystole reported in the same patients. Incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) varied significantly across the studies (from 0.07 to 0.83 patients per year) reflecting variable definitions (new-onset vs. total number of episodes). Conclusion The incidence of arrhythmias among chronic HD patients is high, with bradycardia/asystole occurring more frequently than ventricular arrhythmias. Additional studies to refine estimates particularly of AF are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberts et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Hemodialysis (n=317). Implantable loop recorders was evaluated on Annualized rate of bradycardia/asystole events (95% CI 0.11-0.33). In hemodialysis patients monitored with implantable loop recorders, the annualized rate of bradycardia/asystole was 0.19, significantly higher than the rate of sustained VT/VF (0.02, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: