Key result
Solo primary care practices were significantly more likely to meet clinical guidelines for the ABC composite measure of cardiovascular care compared to practices with multiple clinicians (RR 1.29).
Cross-Sectional (n=134)
Yes
Relative Risk: 1.29 (95% CI 1.12–1.47)
p-value: p=0.011
Small, independent primary care practices in New York City meet individual Million Hearts ABCS goals at rates near 70%, but comprehensive risk factor control (composite ABC) for ASCVD patients remains low at 49%, with solo practices performing slightly better.
Small practices meet most ABCS targets yet only 49% achieve composite ASCVD control; leaves open whether facilitation improves multi-risk management in this setting.
PURPOSE We wanted to describe small, independent primary care practices’ performance in meeting the Million Hearts ABCSs (aspirin use, blood pressure control, cholesterol management, and smoking screening and counseling), as well as on a composite measure that captured the extent to which multiple clinical targets are achieved for patients with a history of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We also explored relationships between practice characteristics and ABCS measures. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional, bivariate analysis using baseline data from 134 practices in New York City. ABCS data were extracted from practices’ electronic health records and aggregated to the site level. Practice characteristics were obtained from surveys of clinicians and staff at each practice. RESULTS The proportion of at-risk patients meeting clinical goals for each of the ABCS measures was 73.0% for aspirin use, 69.6% for blood pressure, 66.7% for cholesterol management, and 74.2% screened for smoking and counseled. For patients with a history of ASCVD, only 49% were meeting all ABC (aspirin use, blood pressure control, cholesterol management) targets (ie, composite measure). Solo practices were more likely to meet clinical guidelines for aspirin (risk ratio [RR] =1.17, P =.007) and composite (RR=1.29, P = .011) than practices with multiple clinicians. CONCLUSION Achieving targets for ABCS measures varied considerably across practices; however, small practices were meeting or exceeding Million Hearts goals (ie, 70% or greater). Practices were less likely to meet consistently clinical targets that apply to patients with a history of ASCVD risk factors. Greater emphasis is needed on providing support for small practices to address the complexity of managing patients with multiple risk factors for primary and secondary ASCVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shelley et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk factors (n=134). Solo practice vs. Practices with multiple clinicians was evaluated on Meeting clinical guidelines for the ABC composite measure (aspirin use, blood pressure control, cholesterol management) (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.12-1.47, p=0.011). Solo primary care practices were significantly more likely to meet clinical guidelines for the ABC composite measure of cardiovascular care compared to practices with multiple clinicians (RR 1.29).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: