Key result
Mapping-guided EAS PVI with a distal circular mapping catheter resulted in similar AF-free survival compared to standard EAS PVI (56% vs. 52%, P=0.875).
Why the study?
Does mapping-guided EAS PVI with a distal CMC in the pulmonary vein improve safety and efficacy compared to standard EAS PVI in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=58)
Does mapping-guided EAS PVI with a distal CMC in the pulmonary vein improve safety and efficacy compared to standard EAS PVI in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mapping-guided EAS PVI with a distal circular mapping catheter is feasible and appears as safe and effective as the standard approach for atrial fibrillation ablation.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is performed with the endoscopically assisted laser balloon ablation system (EAS). We hypothesized that placement of a circular mapping catheter (CMC) in the pulmonary vein (PV) distal to the laser balloon during ablation is feasible and safe. Out of 58 included patients, 37 underwent mapping-guided EAS PVI, with the CMC inside the PV during laser ablation, and 21 patients underwent standard EAS PVI, with the CMC outside the PV during laser ablation. Mean age was 56 years and 81% had paroxysmal AF. In the mapping-guided ablation group, 91% of PVs were isolated with the CMC in the PV during EAS ablation, isolation was completed in 9% of PVs after the CMC was removed from the PV. After passing a learning curve in 18 patients, a significant drop in unsuccessfully isolated PVs was observed in the mapping guided EAS PVI group (15% to 4%, P = 0.020). No major complications were seen in the mapping-guided EAS PVI group. However, in the standard EAS PVI group, laser ablation was complicated by a temporary phrenic nerve palsy in 1 patient. After a median follow-up of 16.7 months, there was no statistical difference in AF free survival among treatment groups (mapping-guided: 56% vs. 52%, P = 0.875). Mapping guided EAS PVI with a distal CMC in the PV during laser ablation is feasible and seems safe as the standard EAS PVI approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gal et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=58). Mapping-guided EAS PVI (circular mapping catheter inside the PV) vs. Standard EAS PVI (circular mapping catheter outside the PV) was evaluated on AF free survival (p=0.875). Mapping-guided EAS PVI with a distal circular mapping catheter resulted in similar AF-free survival compared to standard EAS PVI (56% vs. 52%, P=0.875).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: