Key result
High-intensity interval training moderately increased VO2max (MD 2.06 ml/kg/min) and modestly reduced drug craving (Hedges' g -0.31) compared to control groups in individuals with substance use disorders.
Why the study?
Substance use disorders involve high relapse rates and comorbid somatic and mental health issues, and high-intensity interval training may offer potential benefits in addressing these challenges.
Does high-intensity interval training improve VO2max and reduce drug craving in individuals with substance use disorders?
Meta-Analysis (n=327)
Does high-intensity interval training improve VO2max and reduce drug craving in individuals with substance use disorders?
Mean Difference: 2.06 (95% CI 1.02–3.09)
p-value: p=<0.001
HIIT may improve cardiorespiratory fitness and reduce drug craving in individuals with substance use disorders, though current evidence is limited by low-to-moderate study quality and male-dominated samples.
HIIT may improve fitness and reduce cravings in SUDs; leaves open larger RCTs to confirm efficacy, safety, and adherence.
Background and aim: Substance use disorders (SUDs) are marked by high relapse rates and comorbid somatic and mental health issues. High-intensity interval training (HIIT), a time-efficient form of exercise, may offer potential benefits in addressing these issues. The aim of this systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis was to evaluate the health benefits, safety and adherence of HIIT interventions in individuals with SUDs. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov and the ICTRP for intervention studies published from inception until March 12, 2024. Study quality was assessed using the EPHPP tool. Preliminary meta-analyses were conducted if ≥ 3 studies reported data on the outcomes of interest. To compare the HIIT and control groups, mean differences (MDs) were calculated as effect sizes for outcomes measured on the same scale, while Hedges’ g was used for outcomes measured on different scales. Six intervention studies (N = 327 at baseline; 99% men) were included, comprising one non-randomised and five randomised controlled trials. Preliminary meta-analyses indicated a moderate increase in VO2max after 2–4 months (3 studies; MD = 2.06 ml/kg/min, 95% CI = 1.02–3.09, p < 0.001) and a modest reduction in drug craving after 3 weeks to 6 months (3 studies; Hedges’ g = -0.31, 95% CI = -0.03 to -0.059, p < 0.03) in the HIIT groups, compared to control groups. No evidence for heterogeneity among the included trials was found. Data on other outcomes were insufficient or inconsistent, limiting interpretability. The included trials were rated as being of low to moderate quality. HIIT may improve cardiorespiratory fitness and reduce drug craving among individuals with SUDs, potentially improving treatment outcomes and lowering the risk of relapse. Further research is needed to assess its impact on other outcomes (e.g., cognitive functioning and mental health), and to compare its effectiveness with other forms of exercise. Supported HIIT interventions are shown to be feasible and safe among inpatients, but studies involving outpatients and non-treatment seekers are also needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Türkmen et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Substance use disorders (n=327). High-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. Control groups (usual care, moderate-intensity continuous training, tai chi, or quiet reading) was evaluated on Cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max) (MD 2.06, 95% CI 1.02-3.09, p=<0.001). High-intensity interval training moderately increased VO2max (MD 2.06 ml/kg/min) and modestly reduced drug craving (Hedges' g -0.31) compared to control groups in individuals with substance use disorders.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: