Key result
One year after coronary artery bypass grafting, patients exhibited a consistent deterioration in the mechanics of left ventricular diastolic filling, including increased myocardial stiffness (p<0.001).
Why the study?
Little is known about changes in the mechanical properties of left ventricular relaxation following coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Does elective CABG improve the mechanics of left ventricular diastolic filling at one year in patients with ischemic heart disease?
Cohort (n=96)
Single-blind
Yes
Does elective CABG improve the mechanics of left ventricular diastolic filling at one year in patients with ischemic heart disease?
Mechanistic evaluation reveals a consistent deterioration in left ventricular diastolic filling mechanics one year after elective CABG, indicating that surgical revascularization does not improve diastolic function.
Post-CABG LV diastolic deterioration should not yet alter practice; leaves open whether revascularization affects diastolic function.
Background Ischemic heart disease impairs left ventricular (LV) diastolic function, but little is known about changes in the mechanical properties of LV relaxation following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Objectives This study aimed to explore if and how the mechanics of LV filling change following CABG Methods Patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography before and one year after elective CABG. Mitral inflow Doppler E-waves were analysed using the parameterized diastolic filling (PDF) method, allowing for quantification of diastolic filling mechanics. Results Among patients (n=96, 10% female, median [interquartile range] age 68 [62–74] years), LV ejection fraction (LVEF) at baseline was 59 [53–63] %. At follow-up, there was an increase in the PDF-derived measures of myocardial stiffness, damping, peak driving and resistive forces, together with increase in left atrial (LA) volume index, and a decrease in LA conduit and contractile strains and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (p<0.001 for all). There was no change in heart rate, LV size, LVEF, E/é ratio, or LV filling efficiency. Furthermore, there were no differences in the mechanics of LV filling in patients when grouped according to baseline LVEF, or the number of revascularized coronary arteries Conclusions One year after CABG, there was consistent deterioration in the mechanics of diastolic filling assessed using mechanistic evaluation. Revascularization with CABG does not improve diastolic function one year after CABG. However, causes and significance of these changes remain to be further investigated. The PREFERS study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov with ID-number NCT03671122 . Graphical abstract Overview of background, study design, methods and main results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Norderfeldt et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Ischemic heart disease (n=96). Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. Baseline (pre-operative) was evaluated on Change in PDF-derived measure of myocardial stiffness (p=<0.001). One year after coronary artery bypass grafting, patients exhibited a consistent deterioration in the mechanics of left ventricular diastolic filling, including increased myocardial stiffness (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: