Why the study?
Does a restrictive left ventricular diastolic filling pattern predict worse postoperative outcomes in patients with ischemic mitral valve incompetence and low LVEF undergoing combined CABG and mitral valve repair?
Does a restrictive left ventricular diastolic filling pattern predict worse postoperative outcomes in patients with ischemic mitral valve incompetence and low LVEF undergoing combined CABG and mitral valve repair?
A restrictive left ventricular diastolic filling pattern is a significant predictor of high perioperative mortality and late progression of mitral regurgitation in patients with severe LV dysfunction undergoing combined CABG and mitral valve repair.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May signal high perioperative risk after CABG+MV repair in low-LVEF ischemic MR; leaves open need for prospective validation before guiding decisions.
AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling impairment on postoperative results in patients with low LV ejection fraction (EF) undergoing combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and mitral valve (MV) repair. METHODS AND RESULTS: Study population consisted of 53 patients with ischemic MV incompetence and LV systolic dysfunction (mean EF-26.1 +/- 6%), who underwent CABG with MV repair. Patients were divided into three groups according to the LV diastolic filling pattern. Study protocol included evaluation of perioperative mortality (30 days inhospital mortality), NYHA functional class, and two-dimensional Doppler echocardiographic examination preoperatively, 10-14 days, and 12 months after surgery. The highest perioperative mortality rate (33.3%), unimproved functional status (in 78.5% of the patients, NYHA functional class remained unchanged late after surgery), and hemodynamic deterioration (LV dilatation, progression of mitral regurgitation (MR) was observed in the restriction group). Though early after surgery, MR reduction was significant in this group, at even one year after surgery 85.7% of patients presented with >grade 1 of MR (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that restrictive LV diastolic filling is an important independent preoperative marker (P = 0.035) of progression of MR late after MV repair. CONCLUSION: In patients with severe LV dysfunction undergoing combined CABG and MV repair, restrictive LV diastolic filling pattern is an important preoperative marker of high perioperative mortality rate, further negative remodeling of LV, and progression of mitral regurgitation late after MV repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ereminienė et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: