Key result
Concomitant MV repair during LV reconstruction achieves similar 1-year LV volumes despite larger baseline dimensions.
Why the study?
The impact of mitral valve repair combined with left ventricular reconstruction on left ventricular function in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients was not fully evaluated at 1 year.
Does mitral valve repair associated with left ventricular reconstruction improve left ventricular volumes and function in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=60)
Does mitral valve repair associated with left ventricular reconstruction improve left ventricular volumes and function in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy?
p-value: p=<0.0001
Left ventricular reconstruction provides significant and sustained reduction in LV volumes and improvement in LV function at 1 year, and successful concurrent mitral valve repair may prevent LV redilation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) reconstruction surgery leads to early improvement in LV function in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) patients. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of mitral valve (MV) repair associated with LV reconstruction on LV function 1-year after surgery in ICM patients assessed by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty ICM patients who underwent the combination surgery (LV reconstruction in 60, MV repair in 30, and revascularization in 52 patients) were studied. Real-time 3DE was performed and LV volumes were obtained at baseline, discharge, 6-month and >or=12-month follow-up. Reduction in end-diastolic volumes (EDV) by 29% and in end-systolic volumes by 38% were demonstrated immediately after surgery and remained at subsequent follow-up (P<0.0001). The LV ejection fraction significantly increased by about 10% at discharge and was maintained >or=12-month (P<0.0001). Although the LV volumes were significantly larger in patients with MV repair before surgery (EDV, 235+/-87 mL versus 193+/-67 mL, P<0.05), they were similar to LV volumes of the patients without MV repair at subsequent follow-ups. However, the EDV increased from 139+/-24 mL to 227+/-79 mL (P<0.01) in 7 patients with recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR). Improvement in New York Heart Association functional class occurred in 81% patients during late follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time 3DE demonstrates that LV reconstruction provides significant reduction in LV volumes and improvement in LV function which is sustained throughout the 1-year follow-up with 84% cardiac event free survival. If successful, MV repair may prevent LV redilation, while recurrent MR is associated with increased LV volumes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in Ischemic cardiomyopathy (n=60). Mitral valve repair vs. No mitral valve repair was evaluated on Reduction in end-diastolic volumes (EDV) (p=<0.0001). Mitral valve repair during left ventricular reconstruction resulted in similar follow-up LV volumes compared to patients without MV repair, despite significantly larger baseline volumes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: